Reading this brought back a flood of memories from my early college days, of things I was discovering and learning about in this new world of higher academia. The memories, however, brought to light a problem that I had not fully considered. A great deal of what I learned would later prove to be false to one degree or another!
I wasn't completely uninformed about the problems going in, but I was ill-prepared for what was awaiting me. Some subjects I knew to avoid, such as biological science (it's very important to know something about it, but not necessarily as taught). And the humanities, as I recall, had a nickname, something like "basket weaving?" But chemistry, computer science, physics? False?
Yeah. Not computer science as much, and it wasn't my main focus for the first two years anyway, although I took a seminar in which I researched and presented on AI (such as it was in 1968) my first semester, and I wrote my first software programs in connection with the chemistry class. I began on a lower division engineering track, switching to computer science two years later when the engineering math (or at least the way it was taught) proved to be too much (along with life in general -- there's a lot from that period that I don't write about), and when I discovered that getting good grades was more about regurgitation than understanding. No wonder bridges fall down so easily.
Very thought-provoking, Scip; to paraphrase the quote, "that which we do not understand is magic."
When it comes to Cosmology, it has always been the belief that there was a Big Bang, and it happened X many years ago (even just ~20 years ago the timing was changed again), and that with telescopes we may look into the past, with a few fudges here and there, and see the universe in its nascent stages.
As expected, all these theories have been abject failures.
The whole Big Bang theory, among its myriad flaws, can be kneecapped by using simple logic. The idea that if the universe were created as a finite thing, as defined by having a birth date, then it cannot be infinite; for as we have all experienced, there is a cycle for finite beings: birth, life and death.
This is where it all falls apart for them. If the universe is indeed finite, there ought to be entropy; however, this has not been observed; and if the universe is infinite, there ought to be zero states, or great massive dark spots which have not yet been reached by light at least; again, this has not occurred, despite our supposedly time-machine telescopes.
Even black holes are strictly conjectural, and the laughable infrared image released of the one supposedly at the center of our galaxy was CGI trickery. These astronomers have to invent new ways to keep their jobs as their narratives fall apart, so they push out un-scientific, anti-religious drivel which they know nobody will read, much less understand or care about, and then give themselves awards -- like the Nobel Prize -- so they will have famous names. There is no absolute proof that black holes exist; they themselves admit, if these exist we ought to be seeing literally billions of them, scattered among the other uncountable stars.
We do not see them (which fits their theory that they are invisible, rather like viruses) in such numbers.
So, it comes down to, if there was a Big Bang, the Universe is mortal, and ought to end in a Big Crunch, once it reaches its end; if otherwise, we should see vast stretches of unexplored dark space yet to be illuminated. There is no evidence of either. What has been observed unquestionably is the cycle of life of which all living things -- even the stars, even whole galaxies -- in this universe are beholden.
Which brings up the point that if we are here, and take into account the sheer unknowable number of worlds and stars and galaxies which are apparent, then there must be others here as well, some who, if the universe is as old as they say, are billions of years advanced.
And again, no credible evidence of such beings. My personal take on this: they are shoehorning aliens in there to once more try to sell their bad science on us. Or does nobody else believe that if ETs are real they would not be wasting their time doing abduction/experimentation on Ricky Redneck in Podunk, KS, or some other rural place close to military bases? Is that what allegedly highly evolved aliens would do, do you reckon?
Also, the notion that the Sun is a nuclear reactor, converting Hydrogen into heavier elements in its core, is flat-out mad. I know this is what we were all taught in school, but once again the evidence belies conjecture.
If the Sun is a nuclear reactor, it must have a fuel source, and even with an object as large as it there should be signs of decay as radioactive isotopes are released; and hey guess what -- nonesuch has been discovered. If it spun as fast as claimed, like Jupiter it would be flat at its poles and bulged at its middle, but it is not. The whole thing is ludicrous.
I believe the Sun is like your iPhone charger, it takes an already-existing charge and channels it through, to all planets. The incalculable microwave radiation which is static throughout the whole universe provides the Sun with more energy than it will ever be able to use. This radiation is taken in at the Sun's poles and then distributed out along its equatorial plane, which is where it is channeled to the planets. Basically, the Sun is a giant furnace, not a nuclear reactor in the least bit.
Now, this channeled energy from the Sun is also used by the planets in the same fashion, and eventually returned and replaced cyclically. A circuit is formed. It is my opinion that scientists' solar flares are not caused by the Sun but instead when the Earth passes through this circuit; as would be expected, sometimes the break in the circuit between planet and Sun can cause a surge, same as with electrical current. When this circuit is from a planet the size of Jupiter or Saturn, who get the lion's share, that surge could be massive. This is why, I believe, that when there are unique planetary alignments, such as a szyzgy, unusual occurrences are wont to form, and also why there is no solar cycle: it's all planetary.
*sigh*
Glad I was only going to say a few things and then jog on, eh? A mind is a terrible thing to waste. Thanks for reading!
The Sun and the Moon are still such enigmas to us, the Apollo trickery notwithstanding. Supposedly the Moon is made of dirt and sand, yet we get specular reflections of radio waves and lasers off of its surface, which should be strictly impossible on a rough and uneven surface. Crucially, those lasers test were performed before any of the space missions: the NASA-tards love to claim the Apollo reflectors as proof of the moon missions success.
It's just like the magic telescopes that can see all these wonderful things which are allegedly billions of light years away and just as old, but can't get a look at the Apollo landing site(s). Makes sense, huh?
When I bring this up -- among the multitude of other lies -- to Apollo believers, I get some vague response like, "Well, ground-based telescopes can only be used to search one section of the sky at a time, unlike the orbital ones, which can take in everything because they're outside the atmosphere. They use the ground ones to look at interesting stuff the orbitals find." Yeah, but that is not a response to the question asked.
Why can't you aim it at the Moon and prove, once and for all, that the lander's there? Wouldn't that end the whole debate?
The only logical conclusion is, no man has ever visited the Moon nor been into space, we're too fragile for it. We may shake our fists at the Almighty for it, but we're bound to this world by His design. This leads me to believe the same is true for any ETs out there too. I think every light we see in the heavens could be like Earth, teeming with life yet unable to leave, life which might not be human but still as vulnerable. It would certainly explain a lot (mainly why we haven't been visited/conquered by superior beings).
At this point, if the Moon landings had been legit, we would have 4k livestreams of various locations on the moon. NASA is still using cartoons in 99.9% of their media for stuff we should have thousands of hours of footage of, it’s legit embarrassing at this point.
They still have never been able to produce a "Big Blue Marble" photo that isn't obviously fake. The one from about 2010, which NASA tried to pass off as absolutely authentic, had the same cloud formations photoshopped over and over. I have always said if those are fake then it's all fake. Why can't they take a real distance shot from the Earth? What is prohibiting that or what don't they want us to see?
I believe the answer is that we are stuck on this world, whatever it really is, and cannot go above low orbit. Whatever these entities really are, that are masquerading as creatures from other worlds, they are obviously as stuck here as we are. If I had to say right now I would bet there is no life anywhere but here. That is just my educated guess as well as gut feeling.
Have you noticed that lately they've been ramping up the moon landing hoax? I'm seeing articles written across the board which are pushing the propaganda -- why now?
Could it be that NASA knows nobody's buying their bullshit story anymore, especially when they can't even get a workable rocket to go "back" to the Moon? That they realize people are hip to the fact they somehow can't get to the Moon using today's technology, but could over 50 years ago?
Look, my cell phone has dead zones if I go far enough into the country, but the Apollo astronauts (ha) were able to call the President from the Moon, clear as day, in 1969, with no latency issues. From the Moon, which is over 200,000 miles away. Sure, why not.
NASA's funding depends on their continued campaign of lies to the public, and with government help it's worked flawlessly since inception. Seeing them panic and twist in the wind is sweet victory. People are waking up in more ways than one about these charlatans.
Yes it’s been rather hot and heavy lately on the alien front, which is partially why I released this essay when I did. Pretty hilarious that the day after this essay drops we get more breathless news stories about finding “alien life”:
That in itself proves how utterly stupid these people are.
"Use biosignatures" they say? Well what if the alien life is -- surprise, surprise -- wholly unlike us, in so many ways we might not even see them? Like, what if their physiognomy is based on silicon, or nitrogen, or burlap? It's just flabbergasting that the supposedly greatest minds out there throw this nonsense into the media, and nobody questions it.
And even if they did somehow prove they discovered life on another planet, what difference does it make? Can we shoot them a text, maybe use those magic Apollo phones to do it, ask them about hooking up sometime (but the ride is on them)? You know, anything we did to try and communicate with them would take centuries. Absolute madness.
Finally, taking the word of these people on anything like this (or anything at all, really) is ignorance at its finest. Again, they can find alien life on an exoplanet but they can't find the Apollo landing sites, which are billions of times closer. Make sense of that.
NASA is a DoD tax fraud organization, whose only raison d' etre is to sell CGI-created pictures and outlandish sci-fi stories to the gullible public who wants to believe they can someday get off this despoiled rock and go someplace peaceful. Most likely, if they actually do find a planet with life on it, they'll conspire to murder all of its inhabitants, too. That's how they roll.
When you mention Michaelson Morley failure, have you heard of the Sagnac experiment? Supposedly he proved Aether and his discovery was censored/burried.
And the Pope? Jezuit scum! Have you seen that he is now openly a Marxist?
Aliens? Proton Magic said it all!
I can add that for now, aliens seem to be only in our imagination. And you know who likes to play with us and our imagination!!! So be careful out there ;)
Yes the Sagnac Effect elucidates Michelson-Morley’s results quite a bit. This physicist does a good job explaining it concisely: https://m.youtube.com/shorts/30_axsrCzkw
As for Bergoglio, he has certainly ripped off the mask. He’s giving the Borgia’s a run for their money.
Another WHALE of a topic blown out of the water by SE!
As a virus watcher all I can say is that UFOs from an alien race are like viruses, never isolated or characterized for full public analysis. These things are either too fast to isolate or too small to isolate. They must share strategies for non-capture I reckon.
years ago the stealth bomber ( looked like the black Northrup Grumman model) flew low over my backyard, probably en route to a Rose Parade flyover in Pasadena… remember it being really big, quiet, creepy, bat 🦇 like.
I’ve seen them at air shows and yeah, they are eerily quiet. Of course they nickname this death dealer the “spirit”, the connection seems so obvious now.
Reading this brought back a flood of memories from my early college days, of things I was discovering and learning about in this new world of higher academia. The memories, however, brought to light a problem that I had not fully considered. A great deal of what I learned would later prove to be false to one degree or another!
I wasn't completely uninformed about the problems going in, but I was ill-prepared for what was awaiting me. Some subjects I knew to avoid, such as biological science (it's very important to know something about it, but not necessarily as taught). And the humanities, as I recall, had a nickname, something like "basket weaving?" But chemistry, computer science, physics? False?
Yeah. Not computer science as much, and it wasn't my main focus for the first two years anyway, although I took a seminar in which I researched and presented on AI (such as it was in 1968) my first semester, and I wrote my first software programs in connection with the chemistry class. I began on a lower division engineering track, switching to computer science two years later when the engineering math (or at least the way it was taught) proved to be too much (along with life in general -- there's a lot from that period that I don't write about), and when I discovered that getting good grades was more about regurgitation than understanding. No wonder bridges fall down so easily.
Well, thanks for the memories.
Project Blue Beam is being prepped for the unrolling. They are setting up for the sucker punch to bring in world government.
The pacing of these phony “disclosures” lately sure does lend itself to that possibility.
Very thought-provoking, Scip; to paraphrase the quote, "that which we do not understand is magic."
When it comes to Cosmology, it has always been the belief that there was a Big Bang, and it happened X many years ago (even just ~20 years ago the timing was changed again), and that with telescopes we may look into the past, with a few fudges here and there, and see the universe in its nascent stages.
As expected, all these theories have been abject failures.
The whole Big Bang theory, among its myriad flaws, can be kneecapped by using simple logic. The idea that if the universe were created as a finite thing, as defined by having a birth date, then it cannot be infinite; for as we have all experienced, there is a cycle for finite beings: birth, life and death.
This is where it all falls apart for them. If the universe is indeed finite, there ought to be entropy; however, this has not been observed; and if the universe is infinite, there ought to be zero states, or great massive dark spots which have not yet been reached by light at least; again, this has not occurred, despite our supposedly time-machine telescopes.
Even black holes are strictly conjectural, and the laughable infrared image released of the one supposedly at the center of our galaxy was CGI trickery. These astronomers have to invent new ways to keep their jobs as their narratives fall apart, so they push out un-scientific, anti-religious drivel which they know nobody will read, much less understand or care about, and then give themselves awards -- like the Nobel Prize -- so they will have famous names. There is no absolute proof that black holes exist; they themselves admit, if these exist we ought to be seeing literally billions of them, scattered among the other uncountable stars.
We do not see them (which fits their theory that they are invisible, rather like viruses) in such numbers.
So, it comes down to, if there was a Big Bang, the Universe is mortal, and ought to end in a Big Crunch, once it reaches its end; if otherwise, we should see vast stretches of unexplored dark space yet to be illuminated. There is no evidence of either. What has been observed unquestionably is the cycle of life of which all living things -- even the stars, even whole galaxies -- in this universe are beholden.
Which brings up the point that if we are here, and take into account the sheer unknowable number of worlds and stars and galaxies which are apparent, then there must be others here as well, some who, if the universe is as old as they say, are billions of years advanced.
And again, no credible evidence of such beings. My personal take on this: they are shoehorning aliens in there to once more try to sell their bad science on us. Or does nobody else believe that if ETs are real they would not be wasting their time doing abduction/experimentation on Ricky Redneck in Podunk, KS, or some other rural place close to military bases? Is that what allegedly highly evolved aliens would do, do you reckon?
Also, the notion that the Sun is a nuclear reactor, converting Hydrogen into heavier elements in its core, is flat-out mad. I know this is what we were all taught in school, but once again the evidence belies conjecture.
If the Sun is a nuclear reactor, it must have a fuel source, and even with an object as large as it there should be signs of decay as radioactive isotopes are released; and hey guess what -- nonesuch has been discovered. If it spun as fast as claimed, like Jupiter it would be flat at its poles and bulged at its middle, but it is not. The whole thing is ludicrous.
I believe the Sun is like your iPhone charger, it takes an already-existing charge and channels it through, to all planets. The incalculable microwave radiation which is static throughout the whole universe provides the Sun with more energy than it will ever be able to use. This radiation is taken in at the Sun's poles and then distributed out along its equatorial plane, which is where it is channeled to the planets. Basically, the Sun is a giant furnace, not a nuclear reactor in the least bit.
Now, this channeled energy from the Sun is also used by the planets in the same fashion, and eventually returned and replaced cyclically. A circuit is formed. It is my opinion that scientists' solar flares are not caused by the Sun but instead when the Earth passes through this circuit; as would be expected, sometimes the break in the circuit between planet and Sun can cause a surge, same as with electrical current. When this circuit is from a planet the size of Jupiter or Saturn, who get the lion's share, that surge could be massive. This is why, I believe, that when there are unique planetary alignments, such as a szyzgy, unusual occurrences are wont to form, and also why there is no solar cycle: it's all planetary.
*sigh*
Glad I was only going to say a few things and then jog on, eh? A mind is a terrible thing to waste. Thanks for reading!
Thanks for your equally thought provoking reply.
The Sun and the Moon are still such enigmas to us, the Apollo trickery notwithstanding. Supposedly the Moon is made of dirt and sand, yet we get specular reflections of radio waves and lasers off of its surface, which should be strictly impossible on a rough and uneven surface. Crucially, those lasers test were performed before any of the space missions: the NASA-tards love to claim the Apollo reflectors as proof of the moon missions success.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0zTtAq6lk0c
https://www.nature.com/articles/1941267a0.pdf
It's just like the magic telescopes that can see all these wonderful things which are allegedly billions of light years away and just as old, but can't get a look at the Apollo landing site(s). Makes sense, huh?
When I bring this up -- among the multitude of other lies -- to Apollo believers, I get some vague response like, "Well, ground-based telescopes can only be used to search one section of the sky at a time, unlike the orbital ones, which can take in everything because they're outside the atmosphere. They use the ground ones to look at interesting stuff the orbitals find." Yeah, but that is not a response to the question asked.
Why can't you aim it at the Moon and prove, once and for all, that the lander's there? Wouldn't that end the whole debate?
The only logical conclusion is, no man has ever visited the Moon nor been into space, we're too fragile for it. We may shake our fists at the Almighty for it, but we're bound to this world by His design. This leads me to believe the same is true for any ETs out there too. I think every light we see in the heavens could be like Earth, teeming with life yet unable to leave, life which might not be human but still as vulnerable. It would certainly explain a lot (mainly why we haven't been visited/conquered by superior beings).
At this point, if the Moon landings had been legit, we would have 4k livestreams of various locations on the moon. NASA is still using cartoons in 99.9% of their media for stuff we should have thousands of hours of footage of, it’s legit embarrassing at this point.
They still have never been able to produce a "Big Blue Marble" photo that isn't obviously fake. The one from about 2010, which NASA tried to pass off as absolutely authentic, had the same cloud formations photoshopped over and over. I have always said if those are fake then it's all fake. Why can't they take a real distance shot from the Earth? What is prohibiting that or what don't they want us to see?
I believe the answer is that we are stuck on this world, whatever it really is, and cannot go above low orbit. Whatever these entities really are, that are masquerading as creatures from other worlds, they are obviously as stuck here as we are. If I had to say right now I would bet there is no life anywhere but here. That is just my educated guess as well as gut feeling.
Have you noticed that lately they've been ramping up the moon landing hoax? I'm seeing articles written across the board which are pushing the propaganda -- why now?
Could it be that NASA knows nobody's buying their bullshit story anymore, especially when they can't even get a workable rocket to go "back" to the Moon? That they realize people are hip to the fact they somehow can't get to the Moon using today's technology, but could over 50 years ago?
Look, my cell phone has dead zones if I go far enough into the country, but the Apollo astronauts (ha) were able to call the President from the Moon, clear as day, in 1969, with no latency issues. From the Moon, which is over 200,000 miles away. Sure, why not.
NASA's funding depends on their continued campaign of lies to the public, and with government help it's worked flawlessly since inception. Seeing them panic and twist in the wind is sweet victory. People are waking up in more ways than one about these charlatans.
Yes it’s been rather hot and heavy lately on the alien front, which is partially why I released this essay when I did. Pretty hilarious that the day after this essay drops we get more breathless news stories about finding “alien life”:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/james-webb-telescope-may-have-found-biological-life/
The proof? Literal alien farts 😂
“ What is expected is this: a scientific paper that will provide firm evidence of alien life on an exoplanet (a planet outside our solar system).
The discovery would use biosignatures – gases and chemicals highly likely to have emanated from organic creatures.”
That in itself proves how utterly stupid these people are.
"Use biosignatures" they say? Well what if the alien life is -- surprise, surprise -- wholly unlike us, in so many ways we might not even see them? Like, what if their physiognomy is based on silicon, or nitrogen, or burlap? It's just flabbergasting that the supposedly greatest minds out there throw this nonsense into the media, and nobody questions it.
And even if they did somehow prove they discovered life on another planet, what difference does it make? Can we shoot them a text, maybe use those magic Apollo phones to do it, ask them about hooking up sometime (but the ride is on them)? You know, anything we did to try and communicate with them would take centuries. Absolute madness.
Finally, taking the word of these people on anything like this (or anything at all, really) is ignorance at its finest. Again, they can find alien life on an exoplanet but they can't find the Apollo landing sites, which are billions of times closer. Make sense of that.
NASA is a DoD tax fraud organization, whose only raison d' etre is to sell CGI-created pictures and outlandish sci-fi stories to the gullible public who wants to believe they can someday get off this despoiled rock and go someplace peaceful. Most likely, if they actually do find a planet with life on it, they'll conspire to murder all of its inhabitants, too. That's how they roll.
WE COME IN PEACE, lol.
No mention of the Tychos model ?
https://book.tychos.space/
Great comment, I was actually looking through the comments if someone mentioned it or if Scipio knew about it.
That book looks good, thanks for the recommendation.
A bombastic post Scipio! Thank you
Excellent quote from Tesla.
When you mention Michaelson Morley failure, have you heard of the Sagnac experiment? Supposedly he proved Aether and his discovery was censored/burried.
And the Pope? Jezuit scum! Have you seen that he is now openly a Marxist?
Aliens? Proton Magic said it all!
I can add that for now, aliens seem to be only in our imagination. And you know who likes to play with us and our imagination!!! So be careful out there ;)
Yes the Sagnac Effect elucidates Michelson-Morley’s results quite a bit. This physicist does a good job explaining it concisely: https://m.youtube.com/shorts/30_axsrCzkw
As for Bergoglio, he has certainly ripped off the mask. He’s giving the Borgia’s a run for their money.
They always want to outdo what their predecessors did. Demons who run them are having a ball and a contest, I am sure.
I forgot to add: When you see a 33rd degree mason sharing knowledge with public, shoot first and ask questions later!
Another WHALE of a topic blown out of the water by SE!
As a virus watcher all I can say is that UFOs from an alien race are like viruses, never isolated or characterized for full public analysis. These things are either too fast to isolate or too small to isolate. They must share strategies for non-capture I reckon.
😂
If you’re gonna take a shot at the kings of modern cosmology, you better come fully loaded.
I read this about 6 months ago on Aether is real, its a deep dive and takes time to process, but is a great reference article to keep
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341219567_The_Aether
I'm watching Theoria now but falling asleep. Deep thanks for waking me up.
Hear hear!
Fantasy viruLIENS with Klingon cloaking capabilities!
years ago the stealth bomber ( looked like the black Northrup Grumman model) flew low over my backyard, probably en route to a Rose Parade flyover in Pasadena… remember it being really big, quiet, creepy, bat 🦇 like.
I’ve seen them at air shows and yeah, they are eerily quiet. Of course they nickname this death dealer the “spirit”, the connection seems so obvious now.
That's a NIMBY if I've ever seen one.