An excellent expose of "learning against learning" which is a Jesuit process/technique where one creates false narratives and presents them as truth. Whether public or private, ivy league or small college, the curriculum for the science-based curriculum at all levels of "schooling" is Jesuit-driven. For example, the Jesuits are responsible for the schools of higher criticism, liberation theology, critical theory, the Frankfurt School and its logical positivism, and all cultural marxism narratives. Karl Popper, and Herbert Marcuse are two of the Frankfurt School's famed intellectuals. What Popper, and others, don't acknowledge regarding astronomy is Tychron Brahe did all the mathematics for the motion of planetary bodies within geo-centric universe and Johann Kepler stole his work and placed it into a heliocentric model. Significantly also, one of Marcuse's most famous students was Angela Davis who in 1982 went on a speaking tour to inform her audience there will be a race war and its roots are grounded in cultural marxism. And, we saw some of what she projected come true with a phony BLM movement that preaches tolerance and teaches hate as part of a divide and conquer strategy to confuse those who can't think critically yet believe they can parrot adequately. Back to physics, briefly, Einstein was a Princeton professor who knew far less physics and astronomy than a professor of Psychiatry named Immanuel Velikovsky. In fact, the day Einstein died, on his desk sat an open book entitled Worlds In Collision, one of several works (the follow-up to Age of Chaos) that disputes virtually all the false claims of Nebulae and Tidal theories attributed to Kant, LaPace, and Swedenborg about the origins of the universe and creation of the planets. Though many have tried to discredit Velikovsky, they can not discredit his brilliance at describing the creation of the universe and how the planets have frequently impacted the earth in far briefer time periods than taught by all "modern" universities. Stated differently, catastrophism is factually the norm and not the exception in geology and astronomy. Regarding Charles Darwin, his co-author was Herbert Spencer, another member of the Royal Society, who took their work on evolution so "seriously" that he spent more time as a spiritualist. To be clear, the theory of evolution is Jesuit-based science based on the Delphi Method where one starts with a pre-determined outcome and works backwards. Curiously, but not surprisingly, a Jesuit priest and futurist named Pierre T-Chardin even went so far as to perpetuate the Pilt-Down Man Hoax on academia to provide the "missing link" that was so poorly "crafted" that even Steven J Gould could not adequately resurrect the theory of evolution beyond "strombolites." Richard Dawkins is an entirely different story as is Daniel Denet, both unlikely believe the ridiculous narratives they've crafted. Finally, some extended reading for those who doubt its the Jesuits are the black magicians behind the Bill Hate's and George Soro's and Saul Alinsky's.....https://handbeholdnail.wordpress.com/2018/05/05/the-jesuits-order-of-the-alumbrados-unveiled/
'When our modern societies and pop culture refer to science they largely do not mean the scientific process of observation and experimentation, i.e. observing the observable. Instead they mean “How can you dare argue against the science?”, It's almost amazing how every time you scratch off the scab, the same infection is beneath. It is the Church, admiring men. Taking their words over that of the Lord God Almighty's. I have heard church acquaintences talk about an 'ever expanding universe'. A concept they never saw in the Bible - which directly contradicts Psalms 33, 'By the WORD of YHWH the heavens have been made, and ALL their host by the breath of His mouth.', and Genesis 2:1 that put a timeline on that creation saying - 'Thus the heavens and the earth were COMPLETED in all their vast array.' You cannot reconcile an 'expanding Universe' with these plain statements from the Book; and in fact, there IS NO word 'universe' in the Bible; the cosmo term concocted by men to actually SUGGEST something 'INFINITE', when God ALONE is infinite. I like what Scipio said, 'observing the observable'.. Indeed. For the rays of the sun tell us unequivocably where he sits, as does the moon in a cloud bank at night, and the Cirrus clouds up high that sit motionless thousands of feet above the hub of the 'wheel'.. motionless, observably.. You can't make cigarette smoke do that no matter how still you stay - the slightest motion belies the behavior of the vapours, how then to imagine clouds betraying not the slightest jiggle of air; only by a stationary earth which OH!.. so says the Book again - in I Chronicles 16:30, Psalm 93:1, Psalm 104:5, Isaiah 66:1; There are more but the witness of truth being 2 or 3, these suffice to say - O' man, how foolish you are (and we all were) that we ignored Polaris overhead, a sight visible to the naked eye, and believed the masons that 'God is a liar and the Earth is spinning'. Let God be true, rather, and every man be found a liar.
David knew the truth of God's creation. Yes, and he was a man after God's own heart. And those of us who strive to have that perfect heart can expect to see the Lord's strong arm stretched out on our behalf accordingly. As his eyes search for those hearts that are perfect toward him. How happy we are, that we believe him!
An excellent expose of "learning against learning" which is a Jesuit process/technique where one creates false narratives and presents them as truth. Whether public or private, ivy league or small college, the curriculum for the science-based curriculum at all levels of "schooling" is Jesuit-driven. For example, the Jesuits are responsible for the schools of higher criticism, liberation theology, critical theory, the Frankfurt School and its logical positivism, and all cultural marxism narratives. Karl Popper, and Herbert Marcuse are two of the Frankfurt School's famed intellectuals. What Popper, and others, don't acknowledge regarding astronomy is Tychron Brahe did all the mathematics for the motion of planetary bodies within geo-centric universe and Johann Kepler stole his work and placed it into a heliocentric model. Significantly also, one of Marcuse's most famous students was Angela Davis who in 1982 went on a speaking tour to inform her audience there will be a race war and its roots are grounded in cultural marxism. And, we saw some of what she projected come true with a phony BLM movement that preaches tolerance and teaches hate as part of a divide and conquer strategy to confuse those who can't think critically yet believe they can parrot adequately. Back to physics, briefly, Einstein was a Princeton professor who knew far less physics and astronomy than a professor of Psychiatry named Immanuel Velikovsky. In fact, the day Einstein died, on his desk sat an open book entitled Worlds In Collision, one of several works (the follow-up to Age of Chaos) that disputes virtually all the false claims of Nebulae and Tidal theories attributed to Kant, LaPace, and Swedenborg about the origins of the universe and creation of the planets. Though many have tried to discredit Velikovsky, they can not discredit his brilliance at describing the creation of the universe and how the planets have frequently impacted the earth in far briefer time periods than taught by all "modern" universities. Stated differently, catastrophism is factually the norm and not the exception in geology and astronomy. Regarding Charles Darwin, his co-author was Herbert Spencer, another member of the Royal Society, who took their work on evolution so "seriously" that he spent more time as a spiritualist. To be clear, the theory of evolution is Jesuit-based science based on the Delphi Method where one starts with a pre-determined outcome and works backwards. Curiously, but not surprisingly, a Jesuit priest and futurist named Pierre T-Chardin even went so far as to perpetuate the Pilt-Down Man Hoax on academia to provide the "missing link" that was so poorly "crafted" that even Steven J Gould could not adequately resurrect the theory of evolution beyond "strombolites." Richard Dawkins is an entirely different story as is Daniel Denet, both unlikely believe the ridiculous narratives they've crafted. Finally, some extended reading for those who doubt its the Jesuits are the black magicians behind the Bill Hate's and George Soro's and Saul Alinsky's.....https://handbeholdnail.wordpress.com/2018/05/05/the-jesuits-order-of-the-alumbrados-unveiled/
Exceptionally well put Paul! I’ve pinned this excellent addendum to the top of the comments.
fantastic! thanks Scipio.
Thank you! All I ask is you share it with those you know.
'When our modern societies and pop culture refer to science they largely do not mean the scientific process of observation and experimentation, i.e. observing the observable. Instead they mean “How can you dare argue against the science?”, It's almost amazing how every time you scratch off the scab, the same infection is beneath. It is the Church, admiring men. Taking their words over that of the Lord God Almighty's. I have heard church acquaintences talk about an 'ever expanding universe'. A concept they never saw in the Bible - which directly contradicts Psalms 33, 'By the WORD of YHWH the heavens have been made, and ALL their host by the breath of His mouth.', and Genesis 2:1 that put a timeline on that creation saying - 'Thus the heavens and the earth were COMPLETED in all their vast array.' You cannot reconcile an 'expanding Universe' with these plain statements from the Book; and in fact, there IS NO word 'universe' in the Bible; the cosmo term concocted by men to actually SUGGEST something 'INFINITE', when God ALONE is infinite. I like what Scipio said, 'observing the observable'.. Indeed. For the rays of the sun tell us unequivocably where he sits, as does the moon in a cloud bank at night, and the Cirrus clouds up high that sit motionless thousands of feet above the hub of the 'wheel'.. motionless, observably.. You can't make cigarette smoke do that no matter how still you stay - the slightest motion belies the behavior of the vapours, how then to imagine clouds betraying not the slightest jiggle of air; only by a stationary earth which OH!.. so says the Book again - in I Chronicles 16:30, Psalm 93:1, Psalm 104:5, Isaiah 66:1; There are more but the witness of truth being 2 or 3, these suffice to say - O' man, how foolish you are (and we all were) that we ignored Polaris overhead, a sight visible to the naked eye, and believed the masons that 'God is a liar and the Earth is spinning'. Let God be true, rather, and every man be found a liar.
6 By the word of the Lord were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth.
7 He gathereth the waters of the sea together as an heap: he layeth up the depth in storehouses.
8 Let all the earth fear the Lord: let all the inhabitants of the world stand in awe of him.
9 For he spake, and it was done; he commanded, and it stood fast.
10 The Lord bringeth the counsel of the heathen to nought: he maketh the devices of the people of none effect.
11 The counsel of the Lord standeth for ever, the thoughts of his heart to all generations.
12 Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord; and the people whom he hath chosen for his own inheritance.
13 The Lord looketh from heaven; he beholdeth all the sons of men.
14 From the place of his habitation he looketh upon all the inhabitants of the earth.
Psalm 33:6-14
King David knew the truth of God’s creation.
David knew the truth of God's creation. Yes, and he was a man after God's own heart. And those of us who strive to have that perfect heart can expect to see the Lord's strong arm stretched out on our behalf accordingly. As his eyes search for those hearts that are perfect toward him. How happy we are, that we believe him!