That said, I do hold to the belief that Jesus was most likely born on September 11th, 3 BC and not December 25th. Michael Heiser has discussed the topic in depth:
Excellent presentation of Jewish history and influence. We can read all through the Old Testament first of Israel's longing for Egypt, even while being led by Moses. Ezekiel 20 tells us plainly that they had adopted Egyptian idol worship during their 400 year stay there, and never gave it up. Under Joshua they were given strict instructions to purge the Canaanites, which at least half of the tribes did not do. Even Solomon in all his wisdom was dragged down by the influence of his 1000 wives and concubines, and permitting the worship of other gods. Ezekiel's vision in ch. 8 is the famous 'hole in the wall' scene, where he witnesses exactly what the Jewish leaders are doing behind closed doors, , right before God's Glory departs from the temple. Jeremiah 43 and 44 describe even the returning remnant of Judah after the second exile could not be persuaded to stay away from Egypt. Rather than live in Judah and be restored to God, they pushed onward to Egypt where they were destroyed.
As you rightly say, the New Covenant would be brought by the Messiah, also phrased by Paul as 'circumcision of the heart'. Jews do not get a pass just because of ethnic heritage, their salvation will come in the same manner as those thousands who were added to the kingdom in the beginning of Acts: by accepting Jesus Christ and repenting of their idolatries. This already happens, as in the spread of the 'Messianic Jews' a.k.a. 'Jewish Christians'. INterestingly, there is a sect of Judaism known as Karaites which split off from Rabbinic Judaism after the Exile. They are still around today in small numbers, and reject all Jewish teaching that is not from the Hebrew bible. They even have a different calendar, going back to your point about Saturn / Cube cult.
I am as always impressed by your research. I learn something new with each article you write, which is why I look forward to reading them.
Having said that, I have to inform you that the whole "Saturn has a hexagon at its pole" story is hogwash, made by those who are in-the-know (like the Frankists you mention) for their adherents. It is unfortunate, but listening to or looking at anything NASA (Not A Space Agency, I call it) claims as truth is the exact opposite, which includes amateur astronomers who advantageously are able to afford rare telescopes and cameras. Amateurs who make major planetary discoveries and then never heard from again, no less.
Because once again, you have to consider how illogical it is that NASA is able to launch probes to other planets which perform flawlessly despite allegedly being hundreds of millions (or billions, as with Voyager) of miles/kilometers away, for multiple years, without repair, that send back HD-quality pictures and videos -- yet cannot even do the same for the Moon. What?
Think of it: we supposedly have more detailed pictures/videos of Saturn than our own planet (most certainly the Moon). Make it make sense.
No, that is clearly Kabbalists signaling one another. They want people to believe there is a Saturnian hexagon, for many reasons you stated.
The novel of "2001: A Space Odyssey," written by Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick, has the spaceship (with the apropos name Discovery) travelling to Saturn instead of Jupiter, as in the movie; it was intended to be as in the novel, but Kubrick's special effects team could not generate Saturn believably so it was changed. Yet both novel and film follow the same narrative: mankind advancing through "superior" knowledge, manifested as black monoliths (the original idea was to have them as cubes, but Kubrick wisely side-stepped the blatantly obvious).
Pay close attention to the Kabbalah next time you watch "2001;" the whole movie is filled with the number three. There are three acts in it; three monoliths; three astronauts (Floyd, Poole and Bowman); three eclipses -- every time humans interact with a monolith, eclipses are expressly shown in the background -- and, not least, the numbers 2001 add up to three. Three is the most sacred, significant number to Kabbalah mystics. There is much more numerology in this work than I will delve into here; suffice it to say, the book and film are rife with it.
"2001" was meant to be a representation of the Kabbalah "Tree of Life," which consists of eleven "nodes" and twenty-two paths connecting them (for a total of 33). Usually it is claimed there are only ten "nodes," but an eleventh one is present in many diagrams. This eleventh "node" represents Saturn, for in Kabbalah, depending on planetary alignment, Saturn may switch places with the Sun and become the ruler of our solar system, meaning the dark energies held by Kronos are then released, and those who control those energies gain enlightenment -- all of this simply Satanic mockery.
So, perhaps now you may see the thoughts behind the work of "2001," the spectacular result of which got Kubrick an unprecedented lifetime contract with Warner Bros., that being they would finance any future movies he made, sight unseen, and give him complete creative control. But that is not of most import.
"2001" was partly financed by the government; when filming began in 1964, JFK's promise of a lunar landing by 1969 was both dream and challenge; and knowing such a thing would be impossible, the only way to achieve the result that America wanted would have to be via trickery -- and by which Kubrick had shown a previous mastery, in "Dr. Strangelove." As a primary objective, the Moon had to be recreated believably, and with a practically unlimited budget Kubrick got the job done. He helped create one of the biggest lies ever perpetrated, and also put NASA in the fore (so they could continue lying to us). Incredibly, Kubrick cleverly hid references to the Apollo landings in his later works to let those paying attention that he was responsible for the entire hoax; these people love to rub our noses in it.
I hope I have shed a little light (ha ha) on these people and their beliefs. There is so much more, but that rabbit hole is deep, and very, very dark. Just the way they like it.
You hit it out of the Ballpark!
Superb! Awesome work brother!
I just mirrored both parts on my website and back linked to your substack!
https://lightonlight.education/saturn-sabbath-the-cube-part-i/
Thank you very much!
looking into this a bit more… is “Christmas” really Saturnalia?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturnalia
… and those iPhones, black boxes?
… and the black box warning on drugs?
This is a common misconception:
https://talesoftimesforgotten.com/2019/12/08/just-how-pagan-is-christmas-really/
That said, I do hold to the belief that Jesus was most likely born on September 11th, 3 BC and not December 25th. Michael Heiser has discussed the topic in depth:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDJa2gKQf94
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SS7r3_fxzUc&t=1s
thank you for including the Michael Heiser videos
Excellent presentation of Jewish history and influence. We can read all through the Old Testament first of Israel's longing for Egypt, even while being led by Moses. Ezekiel 20 tells us plainly that they had adopted Egyptian idol worship during their 400 year stay there, and never gave it up. Under Joshua they were given strict instructions to purge the Canaanites, which at least half of the tribes did not do. Even Solomon in all his wisdom was dragged down by the influence of his 1000 wives and concubines, and permitting the worship of other gods. Ezekiel's vision in ch. 8 is the famous 'hole in the wall' scene, where he witnesses exactly what the Jewish leaders are doing behind closed doors, , right before God's Glory departs from the temple. Jeremiah 43 and 44 describe even the returning remnant of Judah after the second exile could not be persuaded to stay away from Egypt. Rather than live in Judah and be restored to God, they pushed onward to Egypt where they were destroyed.
As you rightly say, the New Covenant would be brought by the Messiah, also phrased by Paul as 'circumcision of the heart'. Jews do not get a pass just because of ethnic heritage, their salvation will come in the same manner as those thousands who were added to the kingdom in the beginning of Acts: by accepting Jesus Christ and repenting of their idolatries. This already happens, as in the spread of the 'Messianic Jews' a.k.a. 'Jewish Christians'. INterestingly, there is a sect of Judaism known as Karaites which split off from Rabbinic Judaism after the Exile. They are still around today in small numbers, and reject all Jewish teaching that is not from the Hebrew bible. They even have a different calendar, going back to your point about Saturn / Cube cult.
Thank you VO, and indeed the Karaites were mercilessly persecuted by their Talmudic brethren for that throughout the last two millennia.
I am as always impressed by your research. I learn something new with each article you write, which is why I look forward to reading them.
Having said that, I have to inform you that the whole "Saturn has a hexagon at its pole" story is hogwash, made by those who are in-the-know (like the Frankists you mention) for their adherents. It is unfortunate, but listening to or looking at anything NASA (Not A Space Agency, I call it) claims as truth is the exact opposite, which includes amateur astronomers who advantageously are able to afford rare telescopes and cameras. Amateurs who make major planetary discoveries and then never heard from again, no less.
Because once again, you have to consider how illogical it is that NASA is able to launch probes to other planets which perform flawlessly despite allegedly being hundreds of millions (or billions, as with Voyager) of miles/kilometers away, for multiple years, without repair, that send back HD-quality pictures and videos -- yet cannot even do the same for the Moon. What?
Think of it: we supposedly have more detailed pictures/videos of Saturn than our own planet (most certainly the Moon). Make it make sense.
No, that is clearly Kabbalists signaling one another. They want people to believe there is a Saturnian hexagon, for many reasons you stated.
The novel of "2001: A Space Odyssey," written by Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick, has the spaceship (with the apropos name Discovery) travelling to Saturn instead of Jupiter, as in the movie; it was intended to be as in the novel, but Kubrick's special effects team could not generate Saturn believably so it was changed. Yet both novel and film follow the same narrative: mankind advancing through "superior" knowledge, manifested as black monoliths (the original idea was to have them as cubes, but Kubrick wisely side-stepped the blatantly obvious).
Pay close attention to the Kabbalah next time you watch "2001;" the whole movie is filled with the number three. There are three acts in it; three monoliths; three astronauts (Floyd, Poole and Bowman); three eclipses -- every time humans interact with a monolith, eclipses are expressly shown in the background -- and, not least, the numbers 2001 add up to three. Three is the most sacred, significant number to Kabbalah mystics. There is much more numerology in this work than I will delve into here; suffice it to say, the book and film are rife with it.
"2001" was meant to be a representation of the Kabbalah "Tree of Life," which consists of eleven "nodes" and twenty-two paths connecting them (for a total of 33). Usually it is claimed there are only ten "nodes," but an eleventh one is present in many diagrams. This eleventh "node" represents Saturn, for in Kabbalah, depending on planetary alignment, Saturn may switch places with the Sun and become the ruler of our solar system, meaning the dark energies held by Kronos are then released, and those who control those energies gain enlightenment -- all of this simply Satanic mockery.
So, perhaps now you may see the thoughts behind the work of "2001," the spectacular result of which got Kubrick an unprecedented lifetime contract with Warner Bros., that being they would finance any future movies he made, sight unseen, and give him complete creative control. But that is not of most import.
"2001" was partly financed by the government; when filming began in 1964, JFK's promise of a lunar landing by 1969 was both dream and challenge; and knowing such a thing would be impossible, the only way to achieve the result that America wanted would have to be via trickery -- and by which Kubrick had shown a previous mastery, in "Dr. Strangelove." As a primary objective, the Moon had to be recreated believably, and with a practically unlimited budget Kubrick got the job done. He helped create one of the biggest lies ever perpetrated, and also put NASA in the fore (so they could continue lying to us). Incredibly, Kubrick cleverly hid references to the Apollo landings in his later works to let those paying attention that he was responsible for the entire hoax; these people love to rub our noses in it.
I hope I have shed a little light (ha ha) on these people and their beliefs. There is so much more, but that rabbit hole is deep, and very, very dark. Just the way they like it.
You bring up good points, I'll have to dig more into that amateur finding because you and I are on the same page in regards to NASA's fairytales.
I had no idea about Frankism until I ran across Julius Schoolfish Substack…
https://juliusskoolafish.substack.com/p/brandeis-the-rise-of-the-expert
https://juliusskoolafish.substack.com/p/illuminati-7-the-sabbatean-frankists