I have a friend who won't even listen to this, because he cannot locate this mans bio. After looking for a bit, it seems it may be purposely convoluted. Any idea where to find his legitimate story? Thanks.
He seems like a disinformation agent or just batshit crazy
Sorry. What a crank. Napalm and mustard gas did NOT cause that level of destruction.
For a better source, try the Deep-State-Disappeared Dave Dionisi who was a US intel officer turned good guy who did a lot of charitable work in Africa, wrote many books before being disappeared, interviewed Sister Agnes Sasagawa, the seer of Our Lady of Akita in Japan, and was boots on the ground.
As the firsthand eyewitness Major de Seversky noted, and as I have noted in my second essay on this topic, the damage to Hiroshima and Nagasaki conform rather perfectly with firebombing campaigns of previous cities in Japan — which was done via napalm.
Considering we discussed and cited numerous documented impossibilities within the nuke narrative, is there any evidence you feel supports your assertion beyond fallacious appeals to impossibility?
The acknowledgement of black rain at Nagasaki only occurred within the last few years, after Dr. Palmer’s book was first written.
Thank you for this clarification, it is an error but certainly an understandable one given that this information has only recently come to light. I will pass this info on to Dr. Palmer so he can update his presentation.
That said, this anachronistic error does not suddenly validate the numerous physical impossibilities our governments have pawned off on us as historical facts regarding these events.
I wasn't comparing the cities per se but their destruction profiles which are clearly identical. Non-fire resistant items are destroyed while fire resistant items are not - all typical of fire-bombing but not of nuclear bombs judging by the temperatures they tell us.
I haven't been to Hiroshima or Nagasaki - what's the relevance? There are millions of people here and now who believe there's a dangerous virus out there. They're right here right now and they believe propaganda. Being anywhere generally has little to do with it when it comes to psyops.
"He seems like a disinformation agent or just batshit crazy"
What, can it be that you have issues with his German accent? Beause that is the only thing I could think of that you maybe would find amiss with Herr Palmer. Jokes aside, everything he says seems 100% legit and his conclusion is then quite logical.
And btw, he is not the only one who is saying that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were fire bombed. Some go even further and compare these bombings to the one done in Dresden. Those were the true Holocausts (the definition of Holocaust is: Burnt offering. Supposedly certain jews liked to sacrifice with burning people and animals alive!)
Well, you seem biased or prejudiced about what has been revealed. Good for you.
Here is a good question/observation for all believers in nuclear scare. Do you think the mad man who own/run/use the military industries would not be already using these weapons if they existed?
On the other hand, we are constantly bombarded with INVISIBLE THREATS.
Yep, I would bet on mustard gas (or similar chem.agents) being secretly used in modern times!
Btw, I have a folder of links for debunking nuclear stuff.. in which we can find witnesses to both H&N bombings.
Your guest is either misinformed, confused or dishonest saying “in Hiroshima but not in Nagasaki black rain fell”
Patently false.
He needs to do more research.
He can read the books of Japanese war veteran, MD, friend of Helen Keller, Dr. Takashi “Paul” Nagai who buried his wife’s charred remains and treated burn victims at ground zero, was at the hospital NEAR ground zero, and died of cancer.
Contrary to myth: Nagasaki was NOT destroyed. The Cathedral and the Catholic neighborhood (with Catholic street names) was destroyed.
The industrial port a mile away was untouched.
I literally went from 6 a.m. mass to the Mitsubishi Boat Yard and there’s no chance the US Govt. “missed by a mile”
This bombing was payback for Japanese expulsion of the Freemasons in the 1920s and 30s. Truman and Stimson did humanity dirty with this one.
As to your guests other claims, he needs to see more video, more pictures, and read more interviews of the victims. Better yet, go visit Nagasaki. I can even make great recommendations. It’s a lovely, clean city filled with serious people.
I obviously don’t dispute that people were killed and injured during these attacks, what is in dispute is whether that was from nuclear weapons or other means.
So I’m not exactly sure what your link is proof of, but perhaps you can elucidate that for me because this doctor’s cancer predated the bombings:
“Years later, he would become bedridden from a cancer that had developed in early 1945, months before the bombing.”
I do agree though that Nagasaki was chosen for the reasons you describe.
There are plenty of folks who, in their extreme thirst, went down to the stream at Ground Zero (Nagasaki) to quench their burns and thirst and lacking that tried drinking the rain.
Hiroshima has a large river flowing by with a far greater amount of water.
Both cities have large Cathedrals and Catholic communities.
The link above (and the video of the bomb drop) give lie to the “fully clouded” day story of the government.
Partly cloudy in Nagasaki
Clear day in Kokura
It’s an expense but certainly worthwhile to go to Nagasaki, Hiroshima , Kyoto, Tokyo, Osaka, Shizuoka, to see these bombed places and speak with the victims for oneself. Indeed, there are still folks living who remember the bombings.
I have no doubt that you have been there, talked to people, and otherwise enjoyed your visits. However, just the simple fact there are people living in these allegedly nuked cities, which is impossible if they were indeed nuked, ought to be the most in-your-face evidence.
Those still alive who remember the bombing are miracles, if they somehow survived a nuclear-irradiated city without suffering the health consequences associated with radiation exposure. Chernobyl is a great example here: supposedly toxic for 3,000 years, yet since humans abandoned the city all other surrounding wildlife (like wolves) have moved in and are thriving there today; utterly undoable, if nuked.
Or one could take a look at the Bikini Atoll, where we allegedly detonated many nukes, above and below the surface; today, the corals which we destroyed in 1946 -- irradiated them, no less -- are baffling (their preferred term) the experts by growing back almost completely. Life is going on as before, like we never bothered them.
Personally, I do not believe that nuclear weapons exist. They are the Bogeyman. Their purpose is to keep the ignorant in fear. I see no way, from extraction to detonation of enriched Uranium, that these could or would ever be weapons given the volatility of the elements involved. Simply put, what good is a bomb if it cannot be controlled?
We may agree to disagree, but I think Dr. Palmer did some outstanding work, as he stepped outside his milieu to do so. His research is as good as can be expected, since there are forces out there who want the truth obfuscated.
Dr Palmer strains the gnat and swallows the camel. He brushes past the explosions and the mile-high mushroom clouds. These were documented on film.
Palmer has some circumstantial evidence, some data incongruence, and one guy's opinion after overflying the city. He says nothing about optical evidence of shadows burned into pavement, or kimono patterns burned into skin. He dismisses all the survivors as fools, and all the documented evidence to the contrary as lies in the service of a global conspiracy of his own speculation. Yet he can't account for the obvious fact of the tremendous blasts, he doesn't even try, and you just give him a pass. He doesn't even hint at the impossibly of the logistics necessary to deliver the quantities of napalm and mustard gas necessary if this were to be done.
This is half-baked raving nonsense, and extremely insulting to the survivors. I wonder if either you or the good German doctor have been to Hiroshima or Nagasaki, not that it matters.
This episode is weak Airman. Maybe you just did it for the engagement, which is weak motive. I hope you don't believe this tripe.
Maybe you shouldn't beat your chest so much about having been an Air Force Intel weenie. You're giving those guys a bad name.
He actually addressed all of that in his book, which I know you clearly haven’t read given your ignorant and insulting comment.
You actually believe those fairy tales about nuclear shadows? Embarrassing.
You will have to do much better than remedial insults, Ad hom’s, strawmen, and appeals to incredulity to explain away the numerous physical impossibilities that Dr. Palmer and others have documented.
This isn’t your living room, change the attitude or get banned.
You got me! I didn't read the book. Anyway, after hearing him speak I'm not interested in learning more about his theory. In the interview Dr. Palmer says his case for the actual blasts is speculative and possibly involves fireworks. That's a really big hole in his logical bucket which sounds like a quibble (an argumentative attempt to impose a trivial distinction or raise an objection of no significance to evade the point). Perhaps his book addresses it to your satisfaction, but I'll stick to my guns.
No need to ban me Airman, take my unsubscribe and go with God. May the good Lord bless you and keep you, and grant you all you want out of life.
Awesome! Ive checked the vid that is in the link, meticulous work!
Evidence points to chemical poisoning on ground in Hiroshima and Nagasaki eh? Something else alongside mustard gas?
I heard from a Japanese woman that there is ample evidence how nuclear bombing was a lie. As I hear similar things about the nature around Chernobyl.
And I also heard that they used white phosphorous for the fire bombings in Japan. But that is napalm right?
In any case, said Japanese woman pointed me to Galen Winsor, so I will now point you to him ;)
"The Nuclear Scare Scam: Galen Winsor"
https://www.physiciansforcivildefense.org/2014/06/11/the-nuclear-scare-scam-galen-winsor/
Videos of him are available online last time I checked...
I have a friend who won't even listen to this, because he cannot locate this mans bio. After looking for a bit, it seems it may be purposely convoluted. Any idea where to find his legitimate story? Thanks.
He’s got a pretty common name but here’s Dr. Palmer’s website and some news articles verifying that he was fired for refusing the COVID injections:
https://mpalmer.heresy.is/about/
https://links.uwaterloo.ca/Repeal_UW_Mandatory_Vaccination_Policy/Toronto%20Star%20March%2025%202022%20One%20professor%20fired,%20others%20face%20discipline%20as%20universities%20enforce%20soon-to-expire%20vaccine%20mandates.pdf
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/university-of-waterloo-professor-fake-covid-1.5717576
I read through it all. Thanks.
John Hamer - Nuclear Weapons Hoax Presentation https://odysee.com/@Freefloat:8/John-Hamer-nuclear-weapons:7
Just went to both Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Watched the Palmer video
He seems like a disinformation agent or just batshit crazy
Sorry. What a crank. Napalm and mustard gas did NOT cause that level of destruction.
For a better source, try the Deep-State-Disappeared Dave Dionisi who was a US intel officer turned good guy who did a lot of charitable work in Africa, wrote many books before being disappeared, interviewed Sister Agnes Sasagawa, the seer of Our Lady of Akita in Japan, and was boots on the ground.
https://annas-archive.org/md5/0aec878a7b8026995bd2d55e5a3387c1
You are free to your own opinions of course.
As the firsthand eyewitness Major de Seversky noted, and as I have noted in my second essay on this topic, the damage to Hiroshima and Nagasaki conform rather perfectly with firebombing campaigns of previous cities in Japan — which was done via napalm.
Considering we discussed and cited numerous documented impossibilities within the nuke narrative, is there any evidence you feel supports your assertion beyond fallacious appeals to impossibility?
Just spent another 5 weeks in Japan, a lot of it on foot, met up with fellow substacker S. Martin in Tokyo.
Read Dionisi’s book which has been heavily censored.
Just from the beginning of the interview claiming no black rain in Nagasaki your guest is providing inaccurate information.
The acknowledgement of black rain at Nagasaki only occurred within the last few years, after Dr. Palmer’s book was first written.
Thank you for this clarification, it is an error but certainly an understandable one given that this information has only recently come to light. I will pass this info on to Dr. Palmer so he can update his presentation.
That said, this anachronistic error does not suddenly validate the numerous physical impossibilities our governments have pawned off on us as historical facts regarding these events.
If you compare the destruction profiles of Tokyo, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, they are identical.
Tokyo - https://youtu.be/F1_W4OXD0zY
H & N - https://youtu.be/HoJ1V9lG0xI
Have you been to Tokyo?
Hiroshima?
Nagasaki?
Spoken to the residents?
Apples to Oranges
First off, there’s no comparing either city to Tokyo, or any city for that matter. Maybe Mexico City comes close to Tokyo.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki are dissimilar.
If you haven’t gone and seen with your own eyes, spoken with the residents then you won’t understand.
I wasn't comparing the cities per se but their destruction profiles which are clearly identical. Non-fire resistant items are destroyed while fire resistant items are not - all typical of fire-bombing but not of nuclear bombs judging by the temperatures they tell us.
I haven't been to Hiroshima or Nagasaki - what's the relevance? There are millions of people here and now who believe there's a dangerous virus out there. They're right here right now and they believe propaganda. Being anywhere generally has little to do with it when it comes to psyops.
"He seems like a disinformation agent or just batshit crazy"
What, can it be that you have issues with his German accent? Beause that is the only thing I could think of that you maybe would find amiss with Herr Palmer. Jokes aside, everything he says seems 100% legit and his conclusion is then quite logical.
And btw, he is not the only one who is saying that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were fire bombed. Some go even further and compare these bombings to the one done in Dresden. Those were the true Holocausts (the definition of Holocaust is: Burnt offering. Supposedly certain jews liked to sacrifice with burning people and animals alive!)
Funny
I speak German and just met up with my old friend from German school in the 1990s over the weekend.
Well, you seem biased or prejudiced about what has been revealed. Good for you.
Here is a good question/observation for all believers in nuclear scare. Do you think the mad man who own/run/use the military industries would not be already using these weapons if they existed?
On the other hand, we are constantly bombarded with INVISIBLE THREATS.
Yep, I would bet on mustard gas (or similar chem.agents) being secretly used in modern times!
Btw, I have a folder of links for debunking nuclear stuff.. in which we can find witnesses to both H&N bombings.
Your guest is either misinformed, confused or dishonest saying “in Hiroshima but not in Nagasaki black rain fell”
Patently false.
He needs to do more research.
He can read the books of Japanese war veteran, MD, friend of Helen Keller, Dr. Takashi “Paul” Nagai who buried his wife’s charred remains and treated burn victims at ground zero, was at the hospital NEAR ground zero, and died of cancer.
https://ewtn.co.uk/article-this-catholic-doctor-lost-everything-in-the-nagasaki-bombing-except-faith-hope-and-love/
Contrary to myth: Nagasaki was NOT destroyed. The Cathedral and the Catholic neighborhood (with Catholic street names) was destroyed.
The industrial port a mile away was untouched.
I literally went from 6 a.m. mass to the Mitsubishi Boat Yard and there’s no chance the US Govt. “missed by a mile”
This bombing was payback for Japanese expulsion of the Freemasons in the 1920s and 30s. Truman and Stimson did humanity dirty with this one.
As to your guests other claims, he needs to see more video, more pictures, and read more interviews of the victims. Better yet, go visit Nagasaki. I can even make great recommendations. It’s a lovely, clean city filled with serious people.
I obviously don’t dispute that people were killed and injured during these attacks, what is in dispute is whether that was from nuclear weapons or other means.
So I’m not exactly sure what your link is proof of, but perhaps you can elucidate that for me because this doctor’s cancer predated the bombings:
“Years later, he would become bedridden from a cancer that had developed in early 1945, months before the bombing.”
I do agree though that Nagasaki was chosen for the reasons you describe.
He was screening for TB live because of lack of x ray film.
He was very experienced with war and disease.
Went to his house and museum and picked up some of his books. Worth more research
https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20240803/p2a/00m/0na/010000c
There are plenty of folks who, in their extreme thirst, went down to the stream at Ground Zero (Nagasaki) to quench their burns and thirst and lacking that tried drinking the rain.
Hiroshima has a large river flowing by with a far greater amount of water.
Both cities have large Cathedrals and Catholic communities.
The link above (and the video of the bomb drop) give lie to the “fully clouded” day story of the government.
Partly cloudy in Nagasaki
Clear day in Kokura
It’s an expense but certainly worthwhile to go to Nagasaki, Hiroshima , Kyoto, Tokyo, Osaka, Shizuoka, to see these bombed places and speak with the victims for oneself. Indeed, there are still folks living who remember the bombings.
I just spent a couple of weeks with one of them.
I have no doubt that you have been there, talked to people, and otherwise enjoyed your visits. However, just the simple fact there are people living in these allegedly nuked cities, which is impossible if they were indeed nuked, ought to be the most in-your-face evidence.
Those still alive who remember the bombing are miracles, if they somehow survived a nuclear-irradiated city without suffering the health consequences associated with radiation exposure. Chernobyl is a great example here: supposedly toxic for 3,000 years, yet since humans abandoned the city all other surrounding wildlife (like wolves) have moved in and are thriving there today; utterly undoable, if nuked.
Or one could take a look at the Bikini Atoll, where we allegedly detonated many nukes, above and below the surface; today, the corals which we destroyed in 1946 -- irradiated them, no less -- are baffling (their preferred term) the experts by growing back almost completely. Life is going on as before, like we never bothered them.
Personally, I do not believe that nuclear weapons exist. They are the Bogeyman. Their purpose is to keep the ignorant in fear. I see no way, from extraction to detonation of enriched Uranium, that these could or would ever be weapons given the volatility of the elements involved. Simply put, what good is a bomb if it cannot be controlled?
We may agree to disagree, but I think Dr. Palmer did some outstanding work, as he stepped outside his milieu to do so. His research is as good as can be expected, since there are forces out there who want the truth obfuscated.
Dr Palmer strains the gnat and swallows the camel. He brushes past the explosions and the mile-high mushroom clouds. These were documented on film.
Palmer has some circumstantial evidence, some data incongruence, and one guy's opinion after overflying the city. He says nothing about optical evidence of shadows burned into pavement, or kimono patterns burned into skin. He dismisses all the survivors as fools, and all the documented evidence to the contrary as lies in the service of a global conspiracy of his own speculation. Yet he can't account for the obvious fact of the tremendous blasts, he doesn't even try, and you just give him a pass. He doesn't even hint at the impossibly of the logistics necessary to deliver the quantities of napalm and mustard gas necessary if this were to be done.
This is half-baked raving nonsense, and extremely insulting to the survivors. I wonder if either you or the good German doctor have been to Hiroshima or Nagasaki, not that it matters.
This episode is weak Airman. Maybe you just did it for the engagement, which is weak motive. I hope you don't believe this tripe.
Maybe you shouldn't beat your chest so much about having been an Air Force Intel weenie. You're giving those guys a bad name.
He actually addressed all of that in his book, which I know you clearly haven’t read given your ignorant and insulting comment.
You actually believe those fairy tales about nuclear shadows? Embarrassing.
You will have to do much better than remedial insults, Ad hom’s, strawmen, and appeals to incredulity to explain away the numerous physical impossibilities that Dr. Palmer and others have documented.
This isn’t your living room, change the attitude or get banned.
Scipio,
You got me! I didn't read the book. Anyway, after hearing him speak I'm not interested in learning more about his theory. In the interview Dr. Palmer says his case for the actual blasts is speculative and possibly involves fireworks. That's a really big hole in his logical bucket which sounds like a quibble (an argumentative attempt to impose a trivial distinction or raise an objection of no significance to evade the point). Perhaps his book addresses it to your satisfaction, but I'll stick to my guns.
No need to ban me Airman, take my unsubscribe and go with God. May the good Lord bless you and keep you, and grant you all you want out of life.