Excellent analysis, brother, as always. I always look forward to your next article.
As someone who was in MILINT (military intel), I can tell you that it feels like you are being bombarded from all sides with information, disinformation and complete fallacies because you indeed are.
How many morning meetings did I attend in my 12 years in the field with ONI, Interpol, and various other agencies in which all of our active operations were scrutinized, and all the MILINT and CIVINT (civilian intel) information debated, and every i crossed and t dotted? Meetings in which we were not only encouraged but expected to submit our points of views and ideas; meetings that could sometimes last into early afternoon. So many meetings.
The purpose of all these meetings was to be certain everyone was on the same page when it came to implementing operations; mistakes lead to fatalities; nothing is left to fate. I can still hear my Filipino Senior Chief (Mr. Gleyo, if you are still living, know your words live on) writing "ATTENTION TO DETAIL" on a chalkboard, then pointing to it constantly throughout his briefings, sometimes shouting it aloud to make his points. I truly understand the phrase "the devil is in the details" today because of these sessions.
Every issue is hit from every angle possible; strengths and weaknesses categorized, intended and unintended consequences considered, cultural differences weighed, resources allocated, wants and warrants assigned, applicable ethic and/or morality conflicts, unexpected and expected social issues -- a multitude of highlights and considerations. Nobody leaves until everyone is satisfied moving forward. We would assign plots with confidence levels (Low, Medium, High) and exact them accordingly. It was hard not to have a spinning head after leaving these seminars. The sheer amount of information waded through daily is probably more than all newspapers combined: we had the most up to date intel out of all, based on necessity. Good or bad, we got the news first.
Our teams had doctors and psychologists and mathematicians and statisticians and even clergy if the stakes demanded. People who were highly-educated and trained in ways of manipulation. Men and women whose jobs were to be effective subversionists. These are the ones (and others like them) who came up with the operations and then threw them out into the pit to be debated, and ultimately employed. All of them either worked for or were affiliated with major universities and governmental branches.
Yes, the layers upon layers of propaganda are completely well thought out and generally successful because every single one has been purposely laid and considered by people who do not see the world as we do and live on its terms. It is from these individuals that operations like CONVID, AIDS, wars and conflicts, even pharmaceuticals, as we have seen, yet it is not actually they who are the original thinkers: they take orders like everybody else. The Unseen Committee, I always thought of them, are the true masters. And they have no use for either good or evil, only what is worth value, whether it be in human lives or dirty dollars.
I want everyone to know that if you have ever had the feeling that something is not a coincidence, it is not. Scores of people batted around every conceivable opposition and imposition before they agreed on outcomes. Chance is considered to be Monopoly playing cards. Just remember, someone has already thought about what you have, and it has been ruthlessly debated.
Also, the biggest dilemma, for which no man could ever plan, is God's Will. The idea that that which can go wrong, will, for nothing happens He has not chosen; "the best laid plans of Mice and Men," indeed. No matter how many times we ran and re-ran simulations and estimations, there was always something that occurred that nobody saw coming, and it was always to the planners' consternation: "Why did no one think of this?"
Very easy answer to that one: because despite all efforts to the contrary, God is still in charge, ultimately.
Thank you for your amazing, intelligent and informative comment. I really appreciate your candor. I have seen exactly what you're addressing in other seemingly less fatal forms. I worked in the top levels of the fashion industry and then the film industry.
I try to tell people how every detail of their likes and dislikes, what they think of themselves as a person, the way they live and raise their children, the clothes and items they think they must have, the way they must look and behave, the stars they idolize, the stories themselves, are completely analyzed and planned. Not one iota is left to chance.
It's no accident that twenty years ago when American High School students were polled and asked "What do you want to be when you grow up?", the number one answer by far was, "Famous".
The people who "run" in the high circles making these cultural realities come to be don't care about "the people" in the slightest. They don't revel in the pain or hardships they cause. They simply don't care. As you said, good and evil have no sway. The laws and rules don't matter. It's the power within the circles they care about. Of course money is a part, but money is only another tool to power. That's it.
But God knows everything they think and do. He has a plan they can't overcome or escape and they are part of His plan which drives them insane. Literally.
I am so grateful I was rescued for whatever reason God rescued me from those worlds. I'm certain it was not my doing and I did nothing to deserve His love, but give it He did.
Thank you again for your testimony. All glory to God.
You make a compelling case undermining the plausibility of DNA editing and CRISPR technology, but I still have a few questions.
Do you agree that this tech has been successful in genetically modifying plants? Since one of your sponsors sells non-GMO seeds, I assume that you agree that GMO plants exist and are to be avoided. And GMO plant tech is not so new, I believe the 1990s is when round-up ready glyphosate-resistant crops were first successfully introduced, and CRISPR/Cas9 base editing also being successful more recently in herbicide- and pesticide-resistant and producing crops.
If you agree this is possible, then are you positing that gene editing, or DNA snipping and inserting new genes, fails only in animals or humans?
Another question I have for you is this: have you considered talking to members of top secret government and military groups who have taken part in experimental trials of gene editing? I recommend you at least get in touch with a man named Nathan Reynolds, who is now a Christian and has undergone a great deal of effort and trouble to heal himself of the damage received from what, as he claims, was successful gene editing in his own body that created DNA damage, renal failure and sterility. I know you would be able to go through your contact of Billy Bond of Perma Pastures Farm if you wanted to contact Nathan, and even have him on your show if you wish.
Thanks for your consideration, keep up the great work brother!
Thank you for the thoughtful comments and for engaging so thoroughly with this topic.
To address the first point: genetically modified plants are indeed a reality. The existence of Roundup Ready crops and other GMOs is not in dispute; these technologies have demonstrably altered the genetic makeup of plants to achieve specific traits like herbicide resistance. However, the success of genetic modification in flora does not establish the same feasibility in fauna, much less in humans. Plants and animals operate on fundamentally different genetic systems, cellular repair mechanisms, and developmental complexities. What works in monocots and dicots is not directly transferable to systems of vastly greater biological intricacy, such as the human immune system.
As for Mr. Reynolds, I find it highly probable that he has endured profound hardships and abuse during his life, but I remain skeptical of his broader narrative. I’ve listened to his testimony several times and it touches on nearly every major conspiracy or rabbit hole, which raises a red flag for me. Such close alignment with a wide array of sensational topics (from adrenochrome harvesting, to DNA manipulation & skinwalking) makes his testimony too good to be true for me. This isn't to dismiss his suffering if indeed he was a victim, but when a story conveniently weaves together so many threads of popular intrigue, it should invite questions about exaggeration, manipulation, or even unintentional fabrication due to psychological trauma.
In general, accounts involving SRA and psychological torture are inherently fraught for any investigator to pursue. These practices are specifically designed to distort a person's perception of reality, fracturing their ability to distinguish fact from fiction. Survivors of such abuse often recount experiences that are, by design, nearly impossible to verify because their abusers' goal was to sow confusion and destroy their victims grasp on reality.
"even unintentional fabrication due to psychological trauma"
I have wondered the same, although I will say this: I have read his book and I have listened to him on 5 different interviews and his claims remain remarkably consistent -- so much so that I believe that HE believes his claims. Such is the nature of dissociative identity disorder: a victim's memories can be altered and even false memories inserted, and these "memories" cannot be trusted completely. However, because I am a Christian, I do believe in supernatural works and wonders, not only of Yahweh but also including demonic power that is evidenced plainly in the Bible (for example, Pharaoh's magicians replicating Yahweh's plagues/signs in Exodus). Just because I haven't seen a staff turn into a snake, or read an article on it, I believe it happened. I also believe that our most recent generations of this world (including me and you) are remarkably ignorant of reality and truth, even blind, deluded. I have come to find almost everything I believed and/or was taught to me by my parents' generation has been an outright conspiratorial lie or severely altered: heliocentrism, germ theory, viruses, dispensationalism, representative democratic republic government and free and fair elections, the 'Civil War', Genesis 6, Holocaust, etc. In short, it is easier than ever for me to consider even "sensational" testimonies.
As it relates to your article, however, I was referring to his claims of gene experimentation in clandestine military ops. These would be projects that have no paper trail or available research articles, so I wondered if you had considered anecdotal evidence from him and other sources. One such example would be the claim of inserting feline ocular genes to enhance a soldier's eyesight, or super strength experiments. The reason I believe these experiments are plausibly occurring is because of the history of the Nazi experimentation with 'super soldiers' and continuing in our country following Operation Paperclip. Also, not one of the sources I have found is claiming that these experiments are effective without problems; there is always a larger downside or deficit caused by the experiment, such as sterility, and even cancer and death, with only a short-term gain. But I understand this is nearly entirely speculative, and you deal with provable facts and evidence, which I do appreciate - that's why I support and follow you.
As someone who works in the medical field, I would like to point out what we are taught in school: 3 parts of evidence-based practice are research, clinician expertise, and patient values and experiences. So I do think there is a place for anecdotal evidence, especially if you can identify consistent patterns and themes in case-studies or testimonies. Not everyone can just turn to a meta-analysis or randomized controlled trial. In this day and age, research can be adjusted to make many misleading claims as well.
Off-topic. Do you know what the symbol is on the lapel of Nils Melzer, former United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture. Since most other people surrounding Julian Assange and Wikileaks seem to be controlled opposition I'd say chances are he is too plus he seems awfully smooth.
I always envisioned Noah's ark as being some sort of Space Ship ... with lots of DRAWERS & Cabinets to store DNA. NO REAL animals....Just DNA.... Just a thought
“That being said, I do not discount the possibility that certain batches in this mass experiment could have contained gene editing technology.”
There were/are numerous formulations of the “vaccines”, containing varying ingredients and varying amounts of those ingredients. The different formulations are tracked by batch/lot number, and the scamdemic planners are evaluating the results of each batch to determine their effectiveness at producing different intended results such as immediate death, delayed death, death when combined with other factors (for example 5G), sterilization, etc, and probably several other possible results that I haven’t even thought of. Also, given the obvious sophistication of the scamdemic planners (who are probably using AI far better than that which is available to the general public), it is likely that there are formulations that are designed specifically to create red herrings in order to get researchers chasing false leads and debating irrelevant minutiae instead of focusing on the big picture. Many of the batches are simply placebos, probably a saline solution. This was necessary both to have a control group, and also so that there would be many people who could say “I got a vaccine, and nothing bad happened to me”. If everyone who got a shot had had an adverse reaction, even the clueless sheeple might have figured out that something was wrong and refused to get a shot themselves.
Whistle blower comes forward admitting the CIA paid to have the escape from Wuhan suppressed. Oh, now, i belive it, because they covered it up it must be true.
The flu (Covid-19) was invented, made, and distributed by the good ole US of A. In the USA.
For me the giveaway that Cole and Stuckelberger are both chaos agents was the clear inversion symbolism in the colours they were wearing - she a red jacket and black trousers, he red trousers and black jacket. NOT ACCIDENTAL!
I had been wondering about these 2 ladies too. I unfollowed both of them because I couldn’t make any more excuses for the (unwitting?) paths they were taking.
It's so hard to say whether they genuinely believe this stuff or are paid off, I would tend to say the former, but I'm not super familiar with their research lately to be honest.
I would say most are simply too afraid to accept this brave new world, particularly without the saving power of Jesus Christ to look to for comfort. It is a dark century that we are staring down the barrel of, even darker than the last. The psychological defense mechanisms for the unbeliever are vast, and I can certainly understand the reticence on the part of those with a materialist view of the world tp accepting what has happened.
To accept this level of evil requires a paradigm shift not just on their career fields, but their very existence. It's just easier for most people to dismiss the proof and chalk these repeated "mistakes" up to greed.
RC has never been willing to critique any of these detailed reports either. He could have attempted to repeat the studies using the same materials/methods but instead resorted to specious appeals to authority. None of them are willing to seek the truth. Some are fundamentally opposed to the reality that is Jesus Christ (Truth itself) by their own admission. I am unwilling to take any person seriously who denies the incarnation. I can understand those who are unsure about it but not those who deny it. Doing so makes them an enemy. Strange that it has become an article of trust in addition to being the major article of the Christian faith.
You talk about 'limited hangout' psyops and then proceed to do exactly that. Early in the article the nonsense claim of such a thing as a "PCR Test" is repeated from the liars and murderers that initiated this democide. To be clear, the PCR process is about multiplying very small amounts of something to levels that can used in experiments.
Secondly, and most importantly, to talk about 'viruses as though they exist is a THE limited hangout.
There is absolutely no evidence for 'viruses' anywhere. You even quote from the CDC that their so-called viral gene-sequence only existed "in-silico", ie in their bloody computers.
After absorbing the fact that there is no 'virus' then all the rest of the scam collapses into the stinking pile of shit it is.
People like Malone and McCullogh, still pushing this scam, are doing so because it is their business model.
That’s certainly one interpretation of what has been written. I do not believe their claims about PCR magick or viruses, obviously.
The existence of particles identified as “viruses” is not in question. What they do, why, and whether they are the true cause of the illnesses attributed to them, well that’s what the debate is about.
This essay was less focused on that aspect, and more so on the very specific narratives of gene therapy and the idea that our cells could create the spike protein. Even within their paradigm, this idea is farcical on its face.
I encourage those who wish to explore terrain theory to do so, it’s certainly not a topic that any single essay could hope to tackle.
I highly recommend the writings of the German scientist Stepan Lanka who's showed years ago that viruses do not exist, not the medical community's definition of them, and they do not cause disease.
I think I spelled his name wrong it's Stefan Lanka I first was led to his writings in 2020 when I was working on the book about the fake pandemic the Lord wasted no time in showing me the fallacy and fraudulence of the whole entire viral field of enterprise
As I said in a previous comment, under enough magnification one will discover previously unseen, unidentifiable particles: the whole purpose of magnification.
With regards to their pseudo-science called virology, the particles with which they claim to be dealing with are unable to be viewed by anything less than an electron microscope (which is part of the ridiculousness of wearing masks which couldn't filter out microscopic particles vis-a-vis CONVID). Unless one knows precisely what s/he is looking for, or indeed looking at, under intense magnification even those things considered mundane normally can undergo unexpected, and oftentimes freaky, transformations.
But the "science" virology follows is, if something is not identifiable it must be therefore also original, and as previously undiscovered, patentable, and assigned to be a pathogen.
This is literally how these people are making money.
The particles they are assigning as pathogens are not anything but ultra-magnified bits of their mediums, found and identified falsely, then sent through a computer simulation which is already biased to invent a new threat.
Yeah the blog has the link to the original pdf, I’ll post that link. Maybe try the download link from the post itself. Idk, it works for me, so that’s strange. Probably need to refresh your browser or dump the cache.
& the deep probe of the nose to collect the “specimen” for the worthless PCR test is not without serious risk… wondering if there was any disclosure of that… NO TO EVERYTHING they offer up.
Great paper Scipio! Just some picky points I think chime in with the propaganda issues you are explaining:
“the CDC has rather brazenly admitted that the original “viral” genome called SARS-CoV-2 is a computer simulation.”
-Even so, many people still think that there is a virus it’s just that a computer was also used to simulate the genome. Seems like the CDC admission is a limited hangout.
“Indeed, a 97% false positive rate is not proof of anything”
-There can be no false positive because there is no true positive because there is no virus. Any result of a pcr amplification should just be called an “invalid result” for an invalid test. The word "false positive" is a psy-op.
“mRNA vaccines are said to employ unaltered, naturally occurring messenger RNA to instruct cells to produce specific proteins, such as the alleged spike protein”
-there is no dose-response curve for mRNA to spike (the CDC on FOIA has no evidence of a spike) so mRNA (barely found int he shots) isn’t making any spike and well there is no virus that has a spike to be made for. Ergo, this is a psy-op
“While the twins are almost 5 years old now, it has not been demonstrated that they have a particular immunity to HIV”
-No one has ever found an HIV particle as a virus, so this whole supposed genetic manipulation seems like some psy-op.
Excellent analysis, brother, as always. I always look forward to your next article.
As someone who was in MILINT (military intel), I can tell you that it feels like you are being bombarded from all sides with information, disinformation and complete fallacies because you indeed are.
How many morning meetings did I attend in my 12 years in the field with ONI, Interpol, and various other agencies in which all of our active operations were scrutinized, and all the MILINT and CIVINT (civilian intel) information debated, and every i crossed and t dotted? Meetings in which we were not only encouraged but expected to submit our points of views and ideas; meetings that could sometimes last into early afternoon. So many meetings.
The purpose of all these meetings was to be certain everyone was on the same page when it came to implementing operations; mistakes lead to fatalities; nothing is left to fate. I can still hear my Filipino Senior Chief (Mr. Gleyo, if you are still living, know your words live on) writing "ATTENTION TO DETAIL" on a chalkboard, then pointing to it constantly throughout his briefings, sometimes shouting it aloud to make his points. I truly understand the phrase "the devil is in the details" today because of these sessions.
Every issue is hit from every angle possible; strengths and weaknesses categorized, intended and unintended consequences considered, cultural differences weighed, resources allocated, wants and warrants assigned, applicable ethic and/or morality conflicts, unexpected and expected social issues -- a multitude of highlights and considerations. Nobody leaves until everyone is satisfied moving forward. We would assign plots with confidence levels (Low, Medium, High) and exact them accordingly. It was hard not to have a spinning head after leaving these seminars. The sheer amount of information waded through daily is probably more than all newspapers combined: we had the most up to date intel out of all, based on necessity. Good or bad, we got the news first.
Our teams had doctors and psychologists and mathematicians and statisticians and even clergy if the stakes demanded. People who were highly-educated and trained in ways of manipulation. Men and women whose jobs were to be effective subversionists. These are the ones (and others like them) who came up with the operations and then threw them out into the pit to be debated, and ultimately employed. All of them either worked for or were affiliated with major universities and governmental branches.
Yes, the layers upon layers of propaganda are completely well thought out and generally successful because every single one has been purposely laid and considered by people who do not see the world as we do and live on its terms. It is from these individuals that operations like CONVID, AIDS, wars and conflicts, even pharmaceuticals, as we have seen, yet it is not actually they who are the original thinkers: they take orders like everybody else. The Unseen Committee, I always thought of them, are the true masters. And they have no use for either good or evil, only what is worth value, whether it be in human lives or dirty dollars.
I want everyone to know that if you have ever had the feeling that something is not a coincidence, it is not. Scores of people batted around every conceivable opposition and imposition before they agreed on outcomes. Chance is considered to be Monopoly playing cards. Just remember, someone has already thought about what you have, and it has been ruthlessly debated.
Also, the biggest dilemma, for which no man could ever plan, is God's Will. The idea that that which can go wrong, will, for nothing happens He has not chosen; "the best laid plans of Mice and Men," indeed. No matter how many times we ran and re-ran simulations and estimations, there was always something that occurred that nobody saw coming, and it was always to the planners' consternation: "Why did no one think of this?"
Very easy answer to that one: because despite all efforts to the contrary, God is still in charge, ultimately.
Thank you for your amazing, intelligent and informative comment. I really appreciate your candor. I have seen exactly what you're addressing in other seemingly less fatal forms. I worked in the top levels of the fashion industry and then the film industry.
I try to tell people how every detail of their likes and dislikes, what they think of themselves as a person, the way they live and raise their children, the clothes and items they think they must have, the way they must look and behave, the stars they idolize, the stories themselves, are completely analyzed and planned. Not one iota is left to chance.
It's no accident that twenty years ago when American High School students were polled and asked "What do you want to be when you grow up?", the number one answer by far was, "Famous".
The people who "run" in the high circles making these cultural realities come to be don't care about "the people" in the slightest. They don't revel in the pain or hardships they cause. They simply don't care. As you said, good and evil have no sway. The laws and rules don't matter. It's the power within the circles they care about. Of course money is a part, but money is only another tool to power. That's it.
But God knows everything they think and do. He has a plan they can't overcome or escape and they are part of His plan which drives them insane. Literally.
I am so grateful I was rescued for whatever reason God rescued me from those worlds. I'm certain it was not my doing and I did nothing to deserve His love, but give it He did.
Thank you again for your testimony. All glory to God.
You make a compelling case undermining the plausibility of DNA editing and CRISPR technology, but I still have a few questions.
Do you agree that this tech has been successful in genetically modifying plants? Since one of your sponsors sells non-GMO seeds, I assume that you agree that GMO plants exist and are to be avoided. And GMO plant tech is not so new, I believe the 1990s is when round-up ready glyphosate-resistant crops were first successfully introduced, and CRISPR/Cas9 base editing also being successful more recently in herbicide- and pesticide-resistant and producing crops.
https://www.milkenreview.org/articles/gene-editing-meets-the-food-supply
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10215408/
If you agree this is possible, then are you positing that gene editing, or DNA snipping and inserting new genes, fails only in animals or humans?
Another question I have for you is this: have you considered talking to members of top secret government and military groups who have taken part in experimental trials of gene editing? I recommend you at least get in touch with a man named Nathan Reynolds, who is now a Christian and has undergone a great deal of effort and trouble to heal himself of the damage received from what, as he claims, was successful gene editing in his own body that created DNA damage, renal failure and sterility. I know you would be able to go through your contact of Billy Bond of Perma Pastures Farm if you wanted to contact Nathan, and even have him on your show if you wish.
Thanks for your consideration, keep up the great work brother!
Thank you for the thoughtful comments and for engaging so thoroughly with this topic.
To address the first point: genetically modified plants are indeed a reality. The existence of Roundup Ready crops and other GMOs is not in dispute; these technologies have demonstrably altered the genetic makeup of plants to achieve specific traits like herbicide resistance. However, the success of genetic modification in flora does not establish the same feasibility in fauna, much less in humans. Plants and animals operate on fundamentally different genetic systems, cellular repair mechanisms, and developmental complexities. What works in monocots and dicots is not directly transferable to systems of vastly greater biological intricacy, such as the human immune system.
As for Mr. Reynolds, I find it highly probable that he has endured profound hardships and abuse during his life, but I remain skeptical of his broader narrative. I’ve listened to his testimony several times and it touches on nearly every major conspiracy or rabbit hole, which raises a red flag for me. Such close alignment with a wide array of sensational topics (from adrenochrome harvesting, to DNA manipulation & skinwalking) makes his testimony too good to be true for me. This isn't to dismiss his suffering if indeed he was a victim, but when a story conveniently weaves together so many threads of popular intrigue, it should invite questions about exaggeration, manipulation, or even unintentional fabrication due to psychological trauma.
In general, accounts involving SRA and psychological torture are inherently fraught for any investigator to pursue. These practices are specifically designed to distort a person's perception of reality, fracturing their ability to distinguish fact from fiction. Survivors of such abuse often recount experiences that are, by design, nearly impossible to verify because their abusers' goal was to sow confusion and destroy their victims grasp on reality.
"even unintentional fabrication due to psychological trauma"
I have wondered the same, although I will say this: I have read his book and I have listened to him on 5 different interviews and his claims remain remarkably consistent -- so much so that I believe that HE believes his claims. Such is the nature of dissociative identity disorder: a victim's memories can be altered and even false memories inserted, and these "memories" cannot be trusted completely. However, because I am a Christian, I do believe in supernatural works and wonders, not only of Yahweh but also including demonic power that is evidenced plainly in the Bible (for example, Pharaoh's magicians replicating Yahweh's plagues/signs in Exodus). Just because I haven't seen a staff turn into a snake, or read an article on it, I believe it happened. I also believe that our most recent generations of this world (including me and you) are remarkably ignorant of reality and truth, even blind, deluded. I have come to find almost everything I believed and/or was taught to me by my parents' generation has been an outright conspiratorial lie or severely altered: heliocentrism, germ theory, viruses, dispensationalism, representative democratic republic government and free and fair elections, the 'Civil War', Genesis 6, Holocaust, etc. In short, it is easier than ever for me to consider even "sensational" testimonies.
As it relates to your article, however, I was referring to his claims of gene experimentation in clandestine military ops. These would be projects that have no paper trail or available research articles, so I wondered if you had considered anecdotal evidence from him and other sources. One such example would be the claim of inserting feline ocular genes to enhance a soldier's eyesight, or super strength experiments. The reason I believe these experiments are plausibly occurring is because of the history of the Nazi experimentation with 'super soldiers' and continuing in our country following Operation Paperclip. Also, not one of the sources I have found is claiming that these experiments are effective without problems; there is always a larger downside or deficit caused by the experiment, such as sterility, and even cancer and death, with only a short-term gain. But I understand this is nearly entirely speculative, and you deal with provable facts and evidence, which I do appreciate - that's why I support and follow you.
As someone who works in the medical field, I would like to point out what we are taught in school: 3 parts of evidence-based practice are research, clinician expertise, and patient values and experiences. So I do think there is a place for anecdotal evidence, especially if you can identify consistent patterns and themes in case-studies or testimonies. Not everyone can just turn to a meta-analysis or randomized controlled trial. In this day and age, research can be adjusted to make many misleading claims as well.
Thank you for responding.
Very scary stuff.
Off-topic. Do you know what the symbol is on the lapel of Nils Melzer, former United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture. Since most other people surrounding Julian Assange and Wikileaks seem to be controlled opposition I'd say chances are he is too plus he seems awfully smooth.
https://youtu.be/5BXssAHsVGY?si=3BJ9jkFz1mfmkVis&t=18
From that video it's hard to say, it does look awfully similar to the UN flag. That would be my guess given his former position.
Thanks, Scipio.
I always envisioned Noah's ark as being some sort of Space Ship ... with lots of DRAWERS & Cabinets to store DNA. NO REAL animals....Just DNA.... Just a thought
“That being said, I do not discount the possibility that certain batches in this mass experiment could have contained gene editing technology.”
There were/are numerous formulations of the “vaccines”, containing varying ingredients and varying amounts of those ingredients. The different formulations are tracked by batch/lot number, and the scamdemic planners are evaluating the results of each batch to determine their effectiveness at producing different intended results such as immediate death, delayed death, death when combined with other factors (for example 5G), sterilization, etc, and probably several other possible results that I haven’t even thought of. Also, given the obvious sophistication of the scamdemic planners (who are probably using AI far better than that which is available to the general public), it is likely that there are formulations that are designed specifically to create red herrings in order to get researchers chasing false leads and debating irrelevant minutiae instead of focusing on the big picture. Many of the batches are simply placebos, probably a saline solution. This was necessary both to have a control group, and also so that there would be many people who could say “I got a vaccine, and nothing bad happened to me”. If everyone who got a shot had had an adverse reaction, even the clueless sheeple might have figured out that something was wrong and refused to get a shot themselves.
Absolutely.
Pfizer has admitted to at least 5 different formulations in their documentation. The true number of formulations that were deployed is anyone’s guess.
Escape from Wuhan, my ass.
Whistle blower comes forward admitting the CIA paid to have the escape from Wuhan suppressed. Oh, now, i belive it, because they covered it up it must be true.
The flu (Covid-19) was invented, made, and distributed by the good ole US of A. In the USA.
Spy vs. Spy
This is super heavy
Who was it, Ryan Cole? In a Mike-grabbing moment proclaimed there was NO GO in the jabs…other bad things but absolutely no GO
Yes, Cole and many others. He claims the images we have put forth are merely “salt and cholesterol crystals”, a spurious claim I have addressed in this week’s case study. (https://dfreality.substack.com/p/the-mass-poisoning-of-america-a-case)
https://www.sgtreport.com/2023/02/who-whistle-blower-shut-down-at-stockholm-conference-while-presenting-her-research-on-the-virus-fear-to-digital-control-agenda/
Before his little moment with Dr. Stuckleberger, Cole repeated those same claims on The Highwire with Del Bigtree.
Last episode of his I ever listened to.
For me the giveaway that Cole and Stuckelberger are both chaos agents was the clear inversion symbolism in the colours they were wearing - she a red jacket and black trousers, he red trousers and black jacket. NOT ACCIDENTAL!
Last time listening to COLE... do you still listen to Del Bigtree?
Divide and conquer... they're certainly dividing.
Division is a sign of the demonic.
Unity is a sign of the Holy Spirit
I do not, not that he hasn’t done some good work. I know he’s broached the DEW subject with Dan Wigginton.
Little disturbing….Dr. Rose and Dr. Nass too?
Yes.
I had been wondering about these 2 ladies too. I unfollowed both of them because I couldn’t make any more excuses for the (unwitting?) paths they were taking.
It's so hard to say whether they genuinely believe this stuff or are paid off, I would tend to say the former, but I'm not super familiar with their research lately to be honest.
I would say most are simply too afraid to accept this brave new world, particularly without the saving power of Jesus Christ to look to for comfort. It is a dark century that we are staring down the barrel of, even darker than the last. The psychological defense mechanisms for the unbeliever are vast, and I can certainly understand the reticence on the part of those with a materialist view of the world tp accepting what has happened.
To accept this level of evil requires a paradigm shift not just on their career fields, but their very existence. It's just easier for most people to dismiss the proof and chalk these repeated "mistakes" up to greed.
The smarter they are, the harder they fall, it seems
Here's JR's latest post which shows she has not been willing to follow the evidence wherever it leads https://jessicar.substack.com/p/are-they-trying-to-kill-us?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=516896&post_id=136963479&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=zrsxa&utm_medium=email. She is intelligent enough to easily do so. Moreover, she could have long ago presented a detailed critique of Pablo Campra's work from over 2 years ago and that of Dr Robert O. Young https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/transmission-electron-microscopy-reveals-graphene-oxide-in-cov-19-vaccines, if she believes it to be incorrect. Instead, she said on her own ss, there was no need to look into it because there is enough other evidence to explain it.
RC has never been willing to critique any of these detailed reports either. He could have attempted to repeat the studies using the same materials/methods but instead resorted to specious appeals to authority. None of them are willing to seek the truth. Some are fundamentally opposed to the reality that is Jesus Christ (Truth itself) by their own admission. I am unwilling to take any person seriously who denies the incarnation. I can understand those who are unsure about it but not those who deny it. Doing so makes them an enemy. Strange that it has become an article of trust in addition to being the major article of the Christian faith.
What you said is true. All glory to God.
Thank you, Jesus.
Thank you for that important context.
Once you reject the fundamental logic of existence, the Logos incarnate, well, it should be no surprise when we end up at Babel all over again.
Exactly.
They “got to him”
ALMOST Every man has his price.
St. Thomas More…pray for us.
https://mistermedic.substack.com/p/a-vaccine-for-hungry-kids
&
https://vaccinenation.org/global-health/prof-hotez-malnutrition-vaccines-for-a-hungry-world/
&
https://mistermedic.substack.com/p/a-collection-of-bad-nursery-rhymes?publication_id=849551&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=pf0t8
We got a snake oil, er, vaccine for everything now, step right up and cure your hunger with a vaccine 😂
How about instead of laundering billions of dollars through your university, you just give them some food?
You talk about 'limited hangout' psyops and then proceed to do exactly that. Early in the article the nonsense claim of such a thing as a "PCR Test" is repeated from the liars and murderers that initiated this democide. To be clear, the PCR process is about multiplying very small amounts of something to levels that can used in experiments.
Secondly, and most importantly, to talk about 'viruses as though they exist is a THE limited hangout.
There is absolutely no evidence for 'viruses' anywhere. You even quote from the CDC that their so-called viral gene-sequence only existed "in-silico", ie in their bloody computers.
After absorbing the fact that there is no 'virus' then all the rest of the scam collapses into the stinking pile of shit it is.
People like Malone and McCullogh, still pushing this scam, are doing so because it is their business model.
That’s certainly one interpretation of what has been written. I do not believe their claims about PCR magick or viruses, obviously.
The existence of particles identified as “viruses” is not in question. What they do, why, and whether they are the true cause of the illnesses attributed to them, well that’s what the debate is about.
This essay was less focused on that aspect, and more so on the very specific narratives of gene therapy and the idea that our cells could create the spike protein. Even within their paradigm, this idea is farcical on its face.
I encourage those who wish to explore terrain theory to do so, it’s certainly not a topic that any single essay could hope to tackle.
I understand your point completely.
Does a photograph of a virus exist?
There are many pictures of particles which are claimed to be viruses.
https://www.sciencephoto.com/media/83724/view/2009-h1n1-swine-flu-virus-tem#
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-73162-5
However, a picture is hardly proof that these particle are the source of so many illnesses like what is claimed.
https://viroliegy.com/category/electron-microscope-images/
I highly recommend the writings of the German scientist Stepan Lanka who's showed years ago that viruses do not exist, not the medical community's definition of them, and they do not cause disease.
Thank you for the recommendation.
I love your writings by the way you're the only one I know who has this perfect combination of military and medical awareness
I think I spelled his name wrong it's Stefan Lanka I first was led to his writings in 2020 when I was working on the book about the fake pandemic the Lord wasted no time in showing me the fallacy and fraudulence of the whole entire viral field of enterprise
As I said in a previous comment, under enough magnification one will discover previously unseen, unidentifiable particles: the whole purpose of magnification.
With regards to their pseudo-science called virology, the particles with which they claim to be dealing with are unable to be viewed by anything less than an electron microscope (which is part of the ridiculousness of wearing masks which couldn't filter out microscopic particles vis-a-vis CONVID). Unless one knows precisely what s/he is looking for, or indeed looking at, under intense magnification even those things considered mundane normally can undergo unexpected, and oftentimes freaky, transformations.
But the "science" virology follows is, if something is not identifiable it must be therefore also original, and as previously undiscovered, patentable, and assigned to be a pathogen.
This is literally how these people are making money.
The particles they are assigning as pathogens are not anything but ultra-magnified bits of their mediums, found and identified falsely, then sent through a computer simulation which is already biased to invent a new threat.
Or new variant.
Satan is always evolving his evil ways.
Man's knowledge is utter nonsense to God in His wisdom.
Why is this report from an Argentine ministry written completely in English, except for page header?
This is a translated copy, the original can be found at the linked site.
Thanks for responding. Tried several of the links above and cannot find it.
Would you please point me to the correct link?
Thank you.
https://lorphicweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/download.pdf
Thanks again.
That link, to a Philadephia-hosted WordPress blog, just hangs. I've tried curl, wget, etc. - no document
Hardly an Argentine source ...
I did find this Jan. 2022 Argentine news article stating that
"Argentine health regulator retracts viral internet report "confirming the existence of graphene in AstraZeneca’s Covid vaccine"
https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/argentine-drug-regulatory-agency-retracts-viral-report-confirming-the-existence-of-graphene-in-astrazenecas-covid-vaccine/
Why would you be posting this without making clear that it had been retracted by the Argentine government?
Yeah the blog has the link to the original pdf, I’ll post that link. Maybe try the download link from the post itself. Idk, it works for me, so that’s strange. Probably need to refresh your browser or dump the cache.
https://lorphicweb.com/argentine-health-regulator-retracts-viral-report-confirming-the-existence-of-graphene-in-astrazenecas-covid-vaccine/
The original file was removed by the Argentinian government.
I figured out they retracted it. Why wouldn't you state that when using it in support of your argument?
& the deep probe of the nose to collect the “specimen” for the worthless PCR test is not without serious risk… wondering if there was any disclosure of that… NO TO EVERYTHING they offer up.
Masterful article. I need to read it multiple times. Thank you, Scipio.
Here's an informative video produced by the US Military and released a while back.
GHOSTS IN THE MACHINE : PSYWAR https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uNPZKJqbE8
Great paper Scipio! Just some picky points I think chime in with the propaganda issues you are explaining:
“the CDC has rather brazenly admitted that the original “viral” genome called SARS-CoV-2 is a computer simulation.”
-Even so, many people still think that there is a virus it’s just that a computer was also used to simulate the genome. Seems like the CDC admission is a limited hangout.
“Indeed, a 97% false positive rate is not proof of anything”
-There can be no false positive because there is no true positive because there is no virus. Any result of a pcr amplification should just be called an “invalid result” for an invalid test. The word "false positive" is a psy-op.
“mRNA vaccines are said to employ unaltered, naturally occurring messenger RNA to instruct cells to produce specific proteins, such as the alleged spike protein”
-there is no dose-response curve for mRNA to spike (the CDC on FOIA has no evidence of a spike) so mRNA (barely found int he shots) isn’t making any spike and well there is no virus that has a spike to be made for. Ergo, this is a psy-op
“While the twins are almost 5 years old now, it has not been demonstrated that they have a particular immunity to HIV”
-No one has ever found an HIV particle as a virus, so this whole supposed genetic manipulation seems like some psy-op.
PsyOps all the way down man.
Without belaboring the point, I agree; almost every prevailing scientific narrative over the last century is seriously flawed, virology especially so.
Thank you. Great insights. All glory to God.