Sons of the Covenant: The Untold History of B'nai B'rith, the ADL, & the Assault on Dissent (Part III)
The war on Christian speech, courtesy of the ADL...
“You have become the conscience of this country, no matter what the issue. You have been a pillar of the Jewish community, but you reach out and you have reached out your embrace for all communities.”
― President Joe R. Biden (Crypto-Mason), Speech before the ADL Centennial Gala (April 30th, 2013)
The Wolves Within is a must-read for every believer who refuses to be deceived.
Hit the Tip Jar and help spread the message!
This post contains affiliate links, which means I may receive a commission or affiliate fee for purchases made through these links.
Unlock the mysteries of Biblical cosmology and enrich your faith with some of the top rated Christian reads at BooksOnline.club.
Click the image below and be sure to use promo code SCIPIO for 10% off your order at HeavensHarvest.com: your one stop shop for emergency food, heirloom seeds and survival supplies.
Related Entries
Cloaked in an aura of tolerance and justice, the ADL has, for over a century, carefully cultivated its public visage, presenting itself as the vigilant guardian of pluralism and defender of the downtrodden.
Yet, behind this benign façade lies an organization deeply interwoven with the corridors of power, exerting influence over law enforcement, media narratives, and governmental policy. Former FBI Director James Comey encapsulates the troubling marriage between the ADL and the American intelligence apparatus (emphasis mine):
I first met with you in the spring of 2014, when I was relatively new on the job—just seven months in.
I sang your praises as an organization that fights for inclusivity and diversity, equality and justice. An organization that works with us to fight hate crime and terrorism, to educate law enforcement, and to build bridges with underrepresented communities.
I labeled that last speech a love letter to the ADL. Three years later I can say, from the perspective of the FBI, we’re still in love with you.
— FBI Director James B. Comey, Speech before the ADL National Leadership Summit (May 8th, 2017)
Indeed, the ADL openly boasts of its pervasive influence over American law enforcement, with every FBI agent receiving training conducted by the organization. This includes “close work with federal, state and local law enforcement to assist them in protecting communities from extremism and hate” as well as “information and intelligence” on groups and “individuals”. (ADL.org) Or in plain language, the ADL serves as a non-governmental spying agency utilized by law enforcement.
Its proclaimed mission is an embrace that ostensibly extends to "all communities." But history reveals another face — a face that, beneath layers of polished rhetoric, engages in systematic manipulation, suppression of dissent, and strategic surveillance: all in service of interests far removed from its public declarations. A decade after the founding of Israel, Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion sought to enlist B’nai B’rith in the goal of securing worldwide Jewish allegiance to Israel:
Premier David Ben-Gurion appealed tonight to members of B'nai B'rith, world, Jewish service organization, to link themselves closer to Israel, which he said was the only force that could unify the Jews of the world.
— BEN-GURION ASKS B'NAI B'RITH LINKS; He Urges Members of World Group to Bind Themselves More Closely to Israel (The New York Times, May 28th, 1959)
The historical entanglement of B'nai B'rith with political Zionism, underscored by Ben-Gurion’s appeal, reveals an essential truth about its mission. Far from being solely dedicated to combating discrimination, B'nai B'rith and its most visible arm, the ADL, have always maintained a commitment to advancing Jewish — and specifically Zionist — interests.
“For more than one hundred years, the ADL has successfully portrayed itself as an anti-racist organization dedicated to safeguarding the rights of all Americans, including American blacks, but the truth is exactly the opposite. And when we recognize that the ADL has managed to conceal that reality for more than four generations, we better understand the sort of control the organization has long exercised over both the media and the academic community.”
— Ron Unz, Elon Musk and the True History of the ADL
Under the luminous guise of justice and tolerance, the Anti-Defamation League has methodically crafted a narrative that places it above suspicion and beyond reproach.
Yet the reality is infinitely more complex. For decades, the ADL has entrenched itself within the heart of American power, embedding its influence deeply within law enforcement and intelligence circles. Rusty Rosenthal, a former FBI agent with over two decades of service — including 11 years stationed in Israel — transitioned to the ADL as Vice President of Security & Law Enforcement in April 2023. Rosenthal's appointment underscores the ADL's deep collaboration with law enforcement agencies across the United States.
Consider the revelations first uncovered in January of 1993, when the San Francisco Police Department raided the ADL’s offices, uncovering an elaborate espionage operation:
In January, 1993, San Francisco newspapers reported that the city’s police department had raided the ADL’s Northern California office and discovered it was keeping files on more than 600 largely liberal civic organizations and over 10,000 individuals whose interests and activities included but also went far beyond those of the Arab-American community.
After examining the sequestered files, San Francisco police inspector Ron Roth, estimated that 75% of the information had been illegally obtained and by November, District Attorney Arlo Smith appeared to be on the verge of indicting the ADL for numerous violations of state and city codes.
The appearance was deceiving. With an eye on being elected California’s attorney general the following year, Smith realized, too late as it turned out, that he would need the financial and political clout of San Francisco’s influential Jewish community that had helped to propel him to his job as the city’s DA.
— Jeffrey Blankfort, ADL Spies
Yet despite the weight of evidence, the prosecution mysteriously evaporated under political pressure from San Francisco’s powerful Jewish constituency.
This pattern of political influence-peddling is by no means new to the League. Decades before the San Francisco scandal, the ADL actively Uncovered FBI documents prove that, as early as the late 1930’s, the ADL was passing intelligence to the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC):
By 1937, the Anti-Defamation League had embarked on another occupation, keeping files and spying on what it considered to be communist or pro-communist organizations and individuals.
In that year, a 1947 Congressional hearing revealed, it had begun providing information on the recently formed National Lawyers Guild and on individuals applying for federal civil service jobs and some who had not applied for jobs, to the original House Committee on Un-American Activities, chaired by the notorious racist Rep. Martin Dies, which came to be referred to simply as the Dies Committee.
Newly declassified FBI files obtained by IRmep’s Grant Smith reveal that on August 8, 1940, the ADL offered a confidential list of hundreds of undercover ADL investigators to FBI Director J Edgar Hoover. ADL offered the contact list as a resource for FBI informants and additional undercover agents.
— Jeffrey Blankfort, ADL Spies
Thus, the ADL was not merely cooperating — it was volunteering as an active partner in the political policing of American society. In ways that are strikingly akin to the horribly misnamed Patriot Act or War on Drugs, a relationship ostensibly built on admirable goals (i.e. fighting communism) has once again morphed into a tool to crush the people and silence dissent (ignoring the fact, of course, that the Cold War was entirely an artefact of The Regime’s foreign policy.)
Nor has this function been restricted to domestic matters. Internationally, the ADL’s espionage efforts have demonstrated a consistent alignment with Israeli interests. When former Mossad operative Victor Ostrovsky published revelations about Israel's intelligence operations in the early 1990’s in his book, By Way of Deception, it was the ADL — the alleged American civil rights organization — that aggressively pursued him, demanding he relinquish sensitive Mossad documents directly to them. Such audacity betrays an unmistakable allegiance to Israeli interests, not American ones.
— Anti-Defamation League CEO and National Director Jonathan Greenblatt testifying before Congress.
What remains to be addressed is the central claim that the ADL has built its legacy on: that of rampant or rising anti-Semitism in America. The ADL quantifies anti-Semitism through its annual audit, counting incidents that range widely from verified hate crimes to unconfirmed reports and even hoaxes. Central to this inflated statistical approach is the usage of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition, which conflates genuine racial hatred of Jews (a historical rarity) with criticism of the pagan nation of Israel. This deliberate broadness allows the ADL to systematically reclassify political speech and critiques of Israeli policy as hate crimes, effectively weaponizing “anti-Semitism” to silence dissent.
There are several inconvenient stories complicating this tidy narrative however. In 2017, Ron David Kadar, a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen, orchestrated a series of bomb threats targeting Jewish community centers across the United States. These threats led to widespread evacuations and heightened fears of a surge in “anti-Semitic activity.” Initially, the ADL and other organizations cited these incidents as evidence of increasing anti-Semitism. However, Israeli investigations revealed that Kadar himself was responsible for over 2,000 hoax threats, including those directed at Jewish institutions. He was subsequently convicted and sentenced to 10 years in prison by an Israeli court. Despite the revelation that these threats were fabricated, they had already been included in the ADL's annual audit of anti-Semitic incidents.
Nor is Kadar’s case unique. A rash of similar hoaxes and staged acts have surfaced worldwide in recent years. In 2019, the BerMax Caffé and Bistro in Winnipeg, Canada, reported a hate crime involving anti-Semitic graffiti and vandalism. However, police later determined the incident was staged by the owners themselves. Similarly, in Australia this year, a series of anti-Semitic bombing incidents led to public outrage and an ADL-endorsed narrative of rising hostility; again, investigations ultimately revealed not neo-Nazis, but local criminals paid by heretofore unnamed “outside foreign actors.” One can only surmise which unnamed foreign country would wish to perpetrate anti-Semitic hoaxes against Westerners. Despite their later exposure, such manufactured events invariably remain embedded in the ADL’s inflated annual reports, fueling exaggerated claims of escalating anti-Semitism. Thus, by deliberately including demonstrably false incidents, the ADL perpetuates an artificial sense of crisis, using fabricated narratives as powerful instruments of political influence and social control.
Given these facts, one must reasonably ask, how much of the ADL’s alleged surge in “anti-Semitism” is being conducted not by rabid white nationalists, but foreign provocateurs and hoaxsters?
These cases only underscore the broader concern regarding not only the definition but the methodology employed by the ADL in tracking and reporting these so called anti-Semitic incidents. Under this standard, every college protest against the Israeli genocide in Gaza is now deemed an anti-Semitic incident. The ADL's 2024 audit reported a record 9,354 anti-Semitic incidents in the U.S.. The Kadar case is just one example of many that exemplify how unverified and false reports are assimilated into official statistics, thereby influencing public perception and driving policy decisions based on outright lies.
“[Anti-Semitism] is a a trick, we always use it. When from Europe somebody's criticizing Israel then we bring out the Holocaust; when in [America] people are criticizing you well then they are anti-Semitic.
And the organization is strong and has a lot of money, and the ties between Israel and American Jewish establishment are very strong and they're strong in this country, as you know. And they have power…”
— Shulamit Aloni, Former Israeli Education Minister & Parliamentarian (August 14, 2002)
In the past five years, the weaponization of anti-Semitism has undergone a juridical realization. What was once a slur is now fast becoming statute. As of this writing, 35 states have adopted the IHRA working definition of anti-Semitism via executive order, with another dozen doing so through legislation. In many of these laws (such as South Dakota’s) they do not seek to define what anti-Semitism even is, instead deferring to the IHRA and the definition it provides. One could not ask for a better example of the occupied status of America than the cascade of governors surrendering American jurisprudence to an unaccountable entity of international busybodies.
Its clauses are revealing. To “accuse Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel… than to the interests of their own nations” is antisemitism. To “deny the Jewish people their right to self-determination,” for instance by claiming “the State of Israel is a racist endeavor,” is antisemitism. (This, despite the fact that the Israeli regime is the only nation on Earth that conducts genetic testing to determine citizenship.) To “use symbols associated with classic antisemitism,” such as the crucifixion of Christ, to describe Israel’s treatment of Palestinians — that too is antisemitism.
But this standard applies only to critics, never to partisans. Former U.S. Senator Norm Coleman can openly declare “the masters of the universe are Jews” and that “we need our tech titans to step up as they never have before in defense of the Jewish state,” and no one accuses him of disloyalty or supremacism. If you say it, it’s hate speech. If they say it, it’s community advocacy. If you quote Scripture, also hate speech. But if they demand coordinated censorship campaigns across Silicon Valley, that’s righteous solidarity.
In short, the IHRA definition criminalizes Christian theology, historical inquiry, and moral clarity in equal measure. For the Gospel truth that “the Jews… both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets” (I Thes. 2:15) is now considered hate speech in most of these fifty states. Indeed, simply posting Bible verses (such as Revelation 2:9 & 3:9 for instance) on social media has led to bans or suspensions, flagged by AI moderation tools guided by the ADL’s enforcement partnerships with major social media platforms.
Under this definition, questioning the loyalty of Jewish-American citizens who advocate Zionist interests over American ones are considered anti-Semitic. Indeed, if I were to question the patriotism of politicians, such as Chuck Schumer perhaps, who wish to dismantle the right of Americans and Christians to peaceably advocate against the genocide in Gaza, I too would be guilty of the dastardly crime of “anti-Semitism”. But let the record show: I do question it. I question the patriotism of anyone who leverages American blood and treasure to advance the territorial ambitions of a foreign state.
If that is the charge, than I stand guilty of it.
Now the notion that I genuinely have any racial antipathy for the Jews is, of course, absurd. And as I noted previously, such purely racial animus is a genuine historical rarity. What is, more oft than not, described as “anti-Semitism” is in fact the very real and inescapable frictions between the Rabbinic faith (as expressed in the Mishnah & Talmud), inseparable from Jewry until the modern era, and Christianity. I will not belabor those disagreements again, not that I seek to minimize these differences, as they are indeed vast, but the target of my criticism has always been, and remains so, not the Jewish people as an ethnicity, but the Judaic religion and the sinful behaviors condoned by its teachers. That is a criticism that is not unique to their religion, and it is only the inordinate influence of said religion and the nation of Israel upon my country that forces me to devote so much digital ink to this issue. However, the topic of anti-Semitism is further complicated by the fact that Rabbinic Judaism, as an ethno-chauvinistic religion, is in many ways embedded into even secular Jewish & Israeli culture. It becomes increasingly difficult then to level criticism at any particular area of the Jewish religion or Israeli culture without being painted with the broad brush of anti-Semitism, no matter how justified that criticism may or may not be.
This is not to deny that there is real racial animus in the world — but the modern use of “anti-Semitism” by organizations like the ADL bears no resemblance to it.
— The Order II, digital art, 2025.
Our exploration of the ADL began with the corpse of Mary Phagan in a factory basement and ends with the corpse of our republic, quietly throttled by those who cry “hate” when their power is questioned.
The Anti-Defamation League rose not to defend the innocent but to protect the guilty. From those early days of dossier-building and courtroom manipulation, the League evolved into a private intelligence syndicate masquerading as a moral authority. It spied, censored, threatened, and infiltrated — not to combat hate, but to define hate in whatever way best protected its friends and punished its enemies. It offered undercover agents to J. Edgar Hoover, it silenced journalists, and branded truth-tellers as bigots.
It can not be said more poignantly than this:
Howbeit no man spake openly of him for fear of the Jews.
— The Gospel of John 7:13 KJV
What once echoed through the cloisters of ancient Judea now rings out in the digital town halls of America. Today men fear to speak openly — not of Christ, but, as then, due to His theological adversaries. With the frightening legal and financial weaponry brought to bear against those who do, who could blame them. In the modern West, one need not deny a certain historical event, vandalize a synagogue, or even harbor hatred for a people group to be tarred as an “anti-Semite.” One need only oppose genocide, quote the Gospels, or ask — however gently — whether one’s elected officials ought to prefer the interests of their supposed constituency rather than a foreign ethnostate. Whether it is prudent to conduct the governance of an American state on foreign soil, particularly when it involves silencing dissent of said foreign state.
The ADL, once a civil rights group in appearance if not in practice, has become a full-fledged censorship machine:
The Anti-Defamation League has spent record amounts on lobbying in recent years, including on bills opponents say are meant to punish criticism of Israel and target Jewish peace and Palestinian rights groups.
The Jewish civil rights organization, founded in 1913, is the self-described “leading anti-hate organization in the world”, and has historically focused on combating antisemitism by shaping public opinion. Its lobbying spike marks a dramatic shift – it spent about $100,000 on lobbying in 2020 and is on pace to spend nearly $1.6m this year based on its first quarter expenditures, a Guardian analysis of federal records finds.
— Anti-Defamation League ramps up lobbying to promote controversial definition of antisemitism (The Guardian, May 16th, 2024)
Its lobbying expenditures have exploded — largely in support of legislation that would suppress criticism of Israel and its policies. Bills crafted under the auspices of “combatting anti-Semitism” are routinely deployed to target anti-war groups, Christian ministries, and pro-Palestinian activists. Even Matt Walsh, a pundit at the aggressively Zionist Daily Wire, was forced to acknowledge this peril last summer: these laws not only suppress criticism of Israel, they criminalize Christian speech.
The consequence is clear: the United States has adopted an antichrist theology as a protected class, constructing around it an invisible blasphemy law. These laws are not a shield against hatred — they are a sword against dissent. It is a political mechanism, designed to protect the policies of a foreign nation by muting its critics, slandering its opponents, and criminalizing its theological rivals.
As Christ Himself warned, the day would come when the mere act of speaking His name would invite censure.
In America, that day has come.
And the new Sanhedrin, armed not with stones but subpoenas, wields the law of the land not to preserve liberty, but to erase it.
“B’nai B’rith will surely be in the forefront of that struggle for justice and equality, as they have led us so often in the past.”
― Robert F. Kennedy, Sr., B'nai B'rith: The Story of a Covenant
The Wolves Within is a must-read for every believer who refuses to be deceived.
Hit the Tip Jar and help spread the message!
This post contains affiliate links, which means I may receive a commission or affiliate fee for purchases made through these links.
Unlock the mysteries of Biblical cosmology and enrich your faith with some of the top rated Christian reads at BooksOnline.club.
Click the image below and be sure to use promo code SCIPIO for 10% off your order at HeavensHarvest.com: your one stop shop for emergency food, heirloom seeds and survival supplies.
Further Research
B’nai B’rith: The Story of a Covenant by Edward E. Grusd
Invisible Enemy: Israel, Politics, Media and American Culture by Edward Abboud
very chilling.
in the second to the last video the rep encourages the “scaling of what works” and cites the exploding pagers as a successful example of creativity… can you imagine cellphones rigged to explode upon AI instantaneous evaluation & classification of the communication?
& this is in the context of discussing civilian populations (USA, Argentina, Australia, France.)
Websters definition of semite: 1a : a member of any of a number of peoples of ancient southwestern Asia including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs
b : a descendant of these peoples.
So who is "antisemitic"? (Careful, Websters says only those opposing joos). Jesus Christ is Lord.